Trial reportJournal of medical Internet research2020
Efficacy of a Guided Web-Based Self-Management Intervention for Depression or Dysthymia: Randomized Controlled Trial With a 12-Month Follow-Up Using an Active Control Condition.
Trial report in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acceptability of Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression and Anxiety: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- Digital Psychotherapies for Adults Experiencing Depressive Symptoms: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JMIR mental health · 2024Pooled it
- Heterogeneity of Treatment Effects in Internet- and Mobile-Based Interventions for Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2024Pooled it
- [Efficacy of internet-based interventions for depression available in Germany-A systematic review and meta-analysis].Der Nervenarzt · 2024Pooled it
- Race, Ethnicity, and Other Cultural Background Factors in Trials of Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- Assessing Patient Adherence to and Engagement With Digital Interventions for Depression in Clinical Trials: Systematic Literature Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Pooled it
- Time-Dependent Changes in Depressive Symptoms Among Control Participants in Digital-Based Psychological Intervention Studies: Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Pooled it
- Effectiveness and Acceptance of Technology-Based Psychological Interventions for the Acute Treatment of Unipolar Depression: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Pooled it
- Trial
- Outcome assessment of a complex mental health intervention in the workplace. Results from the MENTUPP pilot study.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2023Trial
- Article
- Comparison Between Browser- and App-Based Versions of a Program for Self-Management of Mild to Moderate Depression: Log Data Analysis of a Convenience Sample.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Community-Based 4-Level Intervention Targeting Depression and Suicidal Behavior in Europe: Protocol for an Implementation Project.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Impact of an App-Based Resilience Training on Enhancing Stress Regulation and Mental Health.Neuropsychobiology · 2025Article
- Use of Random Forest to Predict Adherence in an Online Intervention for Depression Using Baseline and Early Usage Data: Model Development and Validation on Retrospective Routine Care Log Data.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Review
- Article
- Empowerment of Italian general practitioners in depression and suicide prevention: the iFightDepression tool, a game changer of the EAAD-Best project.Annals of general psychiatry · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAn increasing number of studies suggest that web-based interventions for patients with depression can reduce their symptoms and are expected to fill currently existing treatment gaps. However, evidence for their efficacy has mainly been derived from comparisons with wait-list or treatment as usual controls. In particular, designs using wait-list controls are unlikely to induce hope and may even have nocebo effects, making it difficult to draw conclusions about the intervention's efficacy. Studies using active controls are rare and have not yielded conclusive results.
objectiveThe main objective of this study is to assess the acute and long-term antidepressant efficacy of a 6-week, guided, web-based self-management intervention building on the principles of cognitive behavioral therapy (iFightDepression tool) for patients with depression compared with web-based progressive muscle relaxation as an active control condition.
methodsA total of 348 patients with mild-to-moderate depressive symptoms or dysthymia (according to the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview) were recruited online and randomly assigned to 1 of the 2 intervention arms. Acute antidepressant effects after 6 weeks and long-term effects at 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up were studied using the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-self-rating as a primary outcome parameter and change in quality of life (Short Form 12) and user satisfaction (client satisfaction questionnaire) as secondary outcome parameters. Treatment effects were assessed using mixed model analyses.
resultsOver the entire observation period, a greater reduction in symptoms of depression (P=.01) and a greater improvement of life quality (P<.001) was found in the intervention group compared with the active control group. Separate tests for each time point revealed significant effects on depressive symptoms at the 3-month follow-up (d=0.281; 95% CI 0.069 to 0.493), but not after 6 weeks (main outcome:d=0.192; 95% CI -0.020 to 0.404) and 6 and 12 months. The intervention was significantly superior to the control condition with respect to user satisfaction (25.31 vs 21.97; t
conclusionsThe fact that antidepressant effects have been found for a guided self-management tool in comparison with an active control strengthens the evidence base for the efficacy of web-based interventions. The antidepressant effect became most prominent at the 3-month follow-up. After 6 weeks of intervention, significant positive effects were observed on life quality but not on depressive symptoms. Although the effect size of such web-based interventions on symptoms of depression might be smaller than that suggested by earlier studies using wait-list control conditions, they can be a cost-effective addition to antidepressants and face-to-face psychotherapy.
trial registrationInternational Clinical Trials Registry Platform ICTRP080-15-09032015; https://apps.who.int/trialsearch/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=DRKS00009323.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.