Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32673225›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2020

Eating Disorder Awareness Campaigns: Thematic and Quantitative Analysis Using Twitter.

Iranzu Viguria, Miguel Angel Alvarez-Mon, Maria Llavero-Valero, Angel Asunsolo Del Barco, Felipe Ortuño, Melchor Alvarez-Mon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Assessment of beliefs and attitudes about electroconvulsive therapy posted on Twitter: An observational study.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2023
    Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Iranzu Viguria *Department of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0369-3212
Miguel Angel Alvarez-Mon *Department of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1987-0394
Maria Llavero-ValeroDepartment of Endocrinology and Nutrition, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5647-5521
Angel Asunsolo Del BarcoDepartment of Surgery, Medical and Social Sciences, University of Alcala, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7898-4685
Felipe OrtuñoDepartment of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1367-8641
Melchor Alvarez-MonDepartment of Medicine and Medical Specialities, University of Alcala, Alcalá de Henares, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1309-7510

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth awareness initiatives are frequent but their efficacy is a matter of controversy. We have investigated the effect of the Eating Disorder Awareness Week and Wake Up Weight Watchers campaigns on Twitter.

objectiveWe aimed to examine whether the Eating Disorder Awareness Week and Wake Up Weight Watchers initiatives increased the volume and dissemination of Twitter conversations related to eating disorders and investigate what content generates the most interest on Twitter.

methodsOver a period of 12 consecutive days in 2018, we collected tweets containing the hashtag #wakeupweightwatchers and hashtags related to Eating Disorder Awareness Week (#eatingdisorderawarenessweek, #eatingdisorderawareness, or #EDAW), with the hashtag #eatingdisorder as a control. The content of each tweet was rated as medical, testimony, help offer, awareness, pro-ana, or anti-ana. We analyzed the number of retweets and favorites generated, as well as the potential reach and impact of the hashtags and the characteristics of contributors.

resultsThe number of #wakeupweightwatchers tweets was higher than that of Eating Disorder Awareness Week and #eatingdisorder tweets (3900, 2056, and 1057, respectively). The content of tweets was significantly different between the hashtags analyzed (P<.001). Medical content was lower in the awareness campaigns. Awareness and help offer content were lower in #wakeupweightwatchers tweets. Retweet and favorite ratios were highest in #wakeupweightwatchers tweets. Eating Disorder Awareness Week achieved the highest impact, and very influential contributors participated.

conclusionsBoth awareness campaigns effectively promoted tweeting about eating disorders. The majority of tweets did not promote any specific preventive or help-seeking behaviors.

Indexed as

Evaluation Studies as TopicFeeding and Eating DisordersHumansSocial Mediaawareness campaignseating disorderssocial mediaTwitter

Identifiers

PMID32673225
PMCPMC7388051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.