Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32673079›Full record

ArticleJCO global oncology2020

Qualitative Study of Pediatric Early Warning Systems' Impact on Interdisciplinary Communication in Two Pediatric Oncology Hospitals With Varying Resources.

Dylan Graetz, Erica C Kaye, Marcela Garza, Gia Ferrara, Mario Rodriguez, Dora Judith Soberanis Vásquez, Alejandra Méndez Aceituno, Federico Antillon-Klussmann, Jami S Gattuso, Belinda N Mandrell and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO global oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Dylan GraetzSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.
Erica C KayeSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.
Marcela GarzaSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.
Gia FerraraSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.
Mario RodriguezUnidad Nacional de Oncología Pediátrica, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Dora Judith Soberanis VásquezUnidad Nacional de Oncología Pediátrica, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Alejandra Méndez AceitunoUnidad Nacional de Oncología Pediátrica, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Federico Antillon-KlussmannUnidad Nacional de Oncología Pediátrica, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Jami S GattusoSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.
Belinda N MandrellSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.
Justin N BakerSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.
Carlos Rodriguez-GalindoSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.
Jennifer W MackDana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Asya AgulnikSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USBoston Children's Hospital · USUniversidad Francisco Marroquín · GT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHospitalized pediatric oncology patients are at high risk of deterioration and require frequent interdisciplinary communication to deliver high-quality care. Pediatric early warning systems (PEWS) are used by hospitals to reduce deterioration, but it is unknown how these systems affect communication about patient care in high- and limited-resource pediatric oncology settings.

methodsThis qualitative study included semistructured interviews describing PEWS and subsequent team communication at 2 pediatric cancer centers, 1 in the United States and 1 in Guatemala. Participants included nurses, and frontline and intensive care providers who experienced recent deterioration events. Transcripts were coded and analyzed inductively using MAXQDA software.

resultsThe study included 41 providers in Guatemala and 42 providers in the United States (33 nurses, 30 ward providers, and 20 pediatric intensive care providers). Major themes identified include "hierarchy," "empowerment," "quality and method of communication," and "trigger." All providers described underlying medical hierarchies affecting the quality of communication regarding patient deterioration events and identified PEWS as empowering. Participants from the United States described the algorithmic approach to care and technology associated with PEWS contributing to impaired clinical judgement and a lack of communication. In both settings, PEWS sparked interdisciplinary communication and inspired action.

conclusionPEWS enhance interdisciplinary communication in high- and limited-resource study settings by empowering bedside providers. Traditional hierarchies contributed to negative communication and, in well-resourced settings, technology and automation resulted in lack of communication. Understanding contextual elements is integral to optimizing PEWS and improving pediatric oncology outcomes in hospitals of all resource levels.

Indexed as

Interdisciplinary CommunicationNeoplasmsChildGuatemalaHospitals, PediatricHumansIntensive Care Units, Pediatric

Identifiers

PMID32673079
PMCPMC7392735
OpenAlexW3042340855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.