Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32672800›Full record

Trial reportJAMA ophthalmology2020

Comparison of Ranibizumab With or Without Verteporfin Photodynamic Therapy for Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy: The EVEREST II Randomized Clinical Trial.

Tock H Lim, Timothy Y Y Lai, Kanji Takahashi, Tien Y Wong, Lee-Jen Chen, Paisan Ruamviboonsuk, Colin S Tan, Won Ki Lee, Chui Ming Gemmy Cheung, Nor Fariza Ngah and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IVMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01846273 (A 24-month, Phase IV, Randomized, Double Masked, Multi-center Study of Ranibizumab Monotherapy or Ranibizumab in Combination With Verteporfin Photodynamic Therapy on Visual Outcome in Patients With Symptomatic Macular Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy), which is not on this map. Cited by 97 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
14.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01846273 phase4completednot on this map

A 24-month, Phase IV, Randomized, Double Masked, Multi-center Study of Ranibizumab Monotherapy or Ranibizumab in Combination With Verteporfin Photodynamic Therapy on Visual Outcome in Patients With Symptomatic Macular Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy

TypeinterventionalSponsorNovartis PharmaceuticalsRan2013 to 2017Enrolled321ConditionsAge-related Macular Degeneration, Polypoidal Choroidal VasculopathyArmsRanibizumab, Verteporfin PDT, Sham PDT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 159 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy Regimens for Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy: A Systematic Review.Ophthalmologica. Journal international d'ophtalmologie. International journal of ophthalmology. Zeitschrift fur Augenheilkunde · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. The polyp regression rate and treatment prognosis of different interventions for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2021
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Proton beam irradiation with anti-VEGF therapy for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: results of a 24-month, phase II randomized study.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Trial
  9. Efficacy, durability, and safety of faricimab in patients from Asian countries with neovascular age-related macular degeneration: 1-Year subgroup analysis of the TENAYA and LUCERNE trials.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Defining failure is not enough.Eye (London, England) · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 11 institutions in 8 countries.

Tock H LimNational Healthcare Group Eye Institute, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
Timothy Y Y LaiDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Kanji TakahashiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan.
Tien Y WongSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Lee-Jen ChenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Paisan RuamviboonsukDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Colin S TanNational Healthcare Group Eye Institute, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
Won Ki LeeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Seoul St Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Chui Ming Gemmy CheungSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Nor Fariza NgahDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hospital Shah Alam, Malaysia.
Ramune PatalauskaiteNovartis Ireland Ltd, Dublin, Ireland.
Philippe MargaronNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Adrian KohEye & Retina Surgeons, Camden Medical Centre, Singapore.
EVEREST II Study Group
Tan Tock Seng Hospital · SGCatholic University of Korea · KRChinese University of Hong Kong · CNEye & Retina Surgeons · SGKansai Medical University · JPMackay Memorial Hospital · TWNational University of Singapore · SGNovartis (Ireland) · IENovartis (Switzerland) · CHRajavithi Hospital · THSingapore Eye Research Institute · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The 2-year efficacy and safety of combination therapy of ranibizumab administered together with verteporfin photodynamic therapy (vPDT) compared with ranibizumab monotherapy in participants with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) are unclear. Objective: To compare treatment outcomes of ranibizumab, 0.5 mg, plus prompt vPDT combination therapy with ranibizumab, 0.5 mg, monotherapy in participants with PCV for 24 months. Design, Setting, and Participants: This 24-month, phase IV, double-masked, multicenter, randomized clinical trial (EVEREST II) was conducted among Asian participants from August 7, 2013, to March 2, 2017, with symptomatic macular PCV confirmed using indocyanine green angiography. Interventions: Participants (N = 322) were randomized 1:1 to ranibizumab, 0.5 mg, plus vPDT (combination therapy group; n = 168) or ranibizumab, 0.5 mg, plus sham PDT (monotherapy group; n = 154). All participants received 3 consecutive monthly ranibizumab injections, followed by a pro re nata regimen. Participants also received vPDT (combination group) or sham PDT (monotherapy group) on day 1, followed by a pro re nata regimen based on the presence of active polypoidal lesions. Main Outcomes and Measures: Evaluation of combination therapy vs monotherapy at 24 months in key clinical outcomes, treatment exposure, and safety. Polypoidal lesion regression was defined as the absence of indocyanine green hyperfluorescence of polypoidal lesions. Results: Among 322 participants (mean [SD] age, 68.1 [8.8] years; 225 [69.9%] male), the adjusted mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) gains at month 24 were 9.6 letters in the combination therapy group and 5.5 letters in the monotherapy group (mean difference, 4.1 letters; 95% CI, 1.0-7.2 letters; P = .005), demonstrating that combination therapy was superior to monotherapy by the BCVA change from baseline to month 24. Combination therapy was superior to monotherapy in terms of complete polypoidal lesion regression at month 24 (81 of 143 [56.6%] vs 23 of 86 [26.7%] participants; P < .001). Participants in the combination group received fewer ranibizumab injections (median, 6.0 [interquartile range (IQR), 4.0-11.0]) than the monotherapy group (median, 12.0 [IQR, 7.0-17.0]) up to month 24. The combination group required a median of 2.0 (IQR, 1.0-3.0) vPDT treatments for 24 months, with 75 of 168 participants (44.6%) requiring only 1 vPDT treatment. Conclusions and Relevance: The 24-month data findings confirm that ranibizumab therapy, given as monotherapy or in combination with vPDT, is efficacious and safe for treatment of PCV. Combination therapy with vPDT added to ranibizumab achieved superior BCVA gain, increased odds of complete polypoidal lesion regression, and fewer treatment episodes compared with ranibizumab monotherapy. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01846273.

Indexed as

AgedAngiogenesis InhibitorsChoroidChoroid DiseasesDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleFluorescein AngiographyFollow-Up StudiesFundus OculiHumansIntravitreal InjectionsMalePhotochemotherapyPhotosensitizing AgentsAngiogenesis InhibitorsPhotosensitizing AgentsRanibizumabVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVerteporfin

Identifiers

PMID32672800
PMCPMC7366282
OpenAlexW3043747921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.