Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32672798›Full record

Observational studyJAMA oncology2020

Adjuvant Systemic Chemotherapy vs Active Surveillance Following Up-front Resection of Isolated Synchronous Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases.

Koen P Rovers, Checca Bakkers, Felice N van Erning, Jacobus W A Burger, Simon W Nienhuijs, Geert A A M Simkens, Geert-Jan M Creemers, Patrick H J Hemmer, Cornelis J A Punt, Valery E P P Lemmens and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JAMA oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Recommendations for the optimal management of peritoneal metastases in patients with colorectal cancer: a TTD and GECOP-SEOQ expert consensus statement.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Advances in the management of peritoneal malignancies.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Presentation of Colorectal Carcinoma as Abdominal Wall Phlegmon.Journal of investigative medicine high impact case reports
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Koen P RoversDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Checca BakkersDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Felice N van ErningDepartment of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Jacobus W A BurgerDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Simon W NienhuijsDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Geert A A M SimkensDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Geert-Jan M CreemersDepartment of Medical Oncology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Patrick H J HemmerDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Cornelis J A PuntDepartment of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Valery E P P LemmensDepartment of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Pieter J TanisDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Ignace H J T de HinghDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLCatharina Ziekenhuis · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NLNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: To date, there are no data on the value of adjuvant systemic chemotherapy following up-front resection of isolated synchronous colorectal peritoneal metastases. Objective: To assess the association between adjuvant systemic chemotherapy and overall survival following up-front resection of isolated synchronous colorectal peritoneal metastases. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this population-based, observational cohort study using nationwide data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (diagnoses between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2017; follow-up until January 31, 2019), 393 patients with isolated synchronous colorectal peritoneal metastases who were alive 3 months after up-front complete cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy were included. Patients allocated to the adjuvant systemic chemotherapy group were matched (1:1) with those allocated to the active surveillance group by propensity scores based on patient-, tumor-, and treatment-level covariates. Exposures: Adjuvant systemic chemotherapy, defined as systemic chemotherapy without targeted therapy, starting within 3 months postoperatively. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall survival was compared between matched groups using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis adjusted for residual imbalance. A landmark analysis was performed by excluding patients who died within 6 months postoperatively. A sensitivity analysis was performed to adjust for unmeasured confounding by major postoperative morbidity. Results: Of 393 patients (mean [SD] age, 61 [10] years; 181 [46%] men), 172 patients (44%) were allocated to the adjuvant systemic chemotherapy group. After propensity score matching of 142 patients in the adjuvant systemic chemotherapy group with 142 patients in the active surveillance group, adjuvant systemic chemotherapy was associated with improved overall survival compared with active surveillance (median, 39.2 [interquartile range, 21.1-111.1] months vs 24.8 [interquartile range, 15.0-58.4] months; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.66; 95% CI, 0.49-0.88; P = .006), which remained consistent after excluding patients who died within 6 months postoperatively (aHR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.50-0.93; P = .02) and after adjustment for major postoperative morbidity (aHR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53-0.95). Conclusions and Relevance: Findings of this study suggest that in patients undergoing up-front resection of isolated synchronous colorectal peritoneal metastases, adjuvant systemic chemotherapy appeared to be associated with improved overall survival. Although randomized trials are needed to address the influence of potential residual confounding and allocation bias on this association, results of this study may be used for clinical decision-making in this patient group for whom no data are available.

Indexed as

Chemotherapy, AdjuvantAgedAntineoplastic AgentsCapecitabineColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleFluorouracilHumansLeucovorinMaleMiddle AgedOxaliplatinPeritoneal NeoplasmsWatchful WaitingAntineoplastic AgentsCapecitabineFluorouracilLeucovorinOxaliplatin

Identifiers

PMID32672798
PMCPMC7366283
OpenAlexW3043058966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.