Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32672537›Full record

ArticleeLife2020

Snigdha Misra, Mariana F Wolfner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. The evolution of sex peptide: sexual conflict, cooperation, and coevolution.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Identification of a micropeptide and multiple secondary cell genes that modulateProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. ThePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Snigdha MisraDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States.
Mariana F WolfnerDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2701-9505

Funding

New Targets for Reproductive Control of Mosquito VectorsR01AI095491 · NIAID · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI Laura C Harrington, Mariana Federica Wolfner · 2011 to 2026
$7.3M
ACTIONS OF SEMINAL PROTEINS IN MATED DROSOPHILA FEMALESR01HD038921 · NICHD · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI WOLFNER, MARIANA FEDERICA · 2000 to 2019
$5.6M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI095491NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD038921
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When females mate with more than one male, the males' paternity share is affected by biases in sperm use. These competitive interactions occur while female and male molecules and cells work interdependently to optimize fertility, including modifying the female's physiology through interactions with male seminal fluid proteins (SFPs). Some modifications persist, indirectly benefiting later males. Indeed, rival males tailor their ejaculates accordingly. Here, we show that SFPs from one male can directly benefit a rival's sperm. We report that Sex Peptide (SP) that a female

Indexed as

Sexual Behavior, AnimalAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsFemaleFertilityIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMalePhysiological PhenomenaReproductionSemenSpermatozoaDrosophila ProteinsIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsSP protein, Drosophilacopulation-complementationD. melanogasterevolutionary biologyfertilitygeneticsgenomicspost-mating responseseminal fluid proteinsperm-bindingsperm competition

Identifiers

PMID32672537
PMCPMC7398695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.