ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2020
Improved Alchemical Free Energy Calculations with Optimized Smoothstep Softcore Potentials.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dual-Coordinate Relative Free Energy Simulations Using Machine-Learned Interatomic Potentials.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
- Molecular Dynamics and Free Energy Calculations Predict Binding Mode and Affinity Determinants of Specialized Pro-Resolving Mediators at GPR101.ACS omega · 2026Article
- MgJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
- Evaluating 7‑Aminopyrazolo[4,3‑ACS omega · 2026Article
- Computing Solvation Free Energies of Small Molecules with Experimental Accuracy.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
- A Relative Binding Free Energy Framework for Structurally Dissimilar Molecules.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- SAMTI: Sampling Adaptive Thermodynamic Integration for Alchemical Free Energy Calculations.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2025Article
- Recent Developments in Amber Biomolecular Simulations.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- FE-ToolKit: A Versatile Software Suite for Analysis of High-Dimensional Free Energy Surfaces and Alchemical Free Energy Networks.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- Discovery of Novel Pyridin-2-yl Urea Inhibitors Targeting ASK1 Kinase and Its Binding Mode by Absolute Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Potential distribution theory of alchemical transfer.The Journal of chemical physics · 2025Article
- Discovery of highly potent phosphodiesterase-1 inhibitors by a combined-structure free energy perturbation approach.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2024Article
- Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction for Membrane Proteins with Alchemical Free Energy Calculation Methods.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2024Article
- Insights and Challenges in Correcting Force Field Based Solvation Free Energies Using a Neural Network Potential.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2024Article
- Adsorption of Flavonoids in a Transcriptional Regulator TtgR: Relative Binding Free Energies and Intermolecular Interactions.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2024Article
- Computational Investigation of BMAA and Its Carbamate Adducts as Potential GluR2 Modulators.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2024Article
- Software Infrastructure for Next-Generation QM/MM-ΔMLP Force Fields.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2024Article
- Targeting the conserved active site of splicing machines with specific and selective small molecule modulators.Nature communications · 2024Article
- An alpha-helical lid guides the target DNA toward catalysis in CRISPR-Cas12a.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Modern Alchemical Free Energy Methods for Drug Discovery Explained.ACS physical chemistry Au · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Progress in the development of GPU-accelerated free energy simulation software has enabled practical applications on complex biological systems and fueled efforts to develop more accurate and robust predictive methods. In particular, this work re-examines concerted (a.k.a., one-step or unified) alchemical transformations commonly used in the prediction of hydration and relative binding free energies (RBFEs). We first classify several known challenges in these calculations into three categories: endpoint catastrophes, particle collapse, and large gradient-jumps. While endpoint catastrophes have long been addressed using softcore potentials, the remaining two problems occur much more sporadically and can result in either numerical instability (i.e., complete failure of a simulation) or inconsistent estimation (i.e., stochastic convergence to an incorrect result). The particle collapse problem stems from an imbalance in short-range electrostatic and repulsive interactions and can, in principle, be solved by appropriately balancing the respective softcore parameters. However, the large gradient-jump problem itself arises from the sensitivity of the free energy to large values of the softcore parameters, as might be used in trying to solve the particle collapse issue. Often, no satisfactory compromise exists with the existing softcore potential form. As a framework for solving these problems, we developed a new family of smoothstep softcore (SSC) potentials motivated by an analysis of the derivatives along the alchemical path. The smoothstep polynomials generalize the monomial functions that are used in most implementations and provide an additional path-dependent smoothing parameter. The effectiveness of this approach is demonstrated on simple yet pathological cases that illustrate the three problems outlined. With appropriate parameter selection, we find that a second-order SSC(2) potential does at least as well as the conventional approach and provides vast improvement in terms of consistency across all cases. Last, we compare the concerted SSC(2) approach against the gold-standard stepwise (a.k.a., decoupled or multistep) scheme over a large set of RBFE calculations as might be encountered in drug discovery.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.