Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32672455›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2020

Improved Alchemical Free Energy Calculations with Optimized Smoothstep Softcore Potentials.

Tai-Sung Lee, Zhixiong Lin, Bryce K Allen, Charles Lin, Brian K Radak, Yujun Tao, Hsu-Chun Tsai, Woody Sherman, Darrin M York

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. MgJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Recent Developments in Amber Biomolecular Simulations.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Potential distribution theory of alchemical transfer.The Journal of chemical physics · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tai-Sung LeeLaboratory for Biomolecular Simulation Research, Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine and Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2110-2279
Zhixiong LinSilicon Therapeutics LLC, Boston, Massachusetts 02111, United States.
Bryce K AllenSilicon Therapeutics LLC, Boston, Massachusetts 02111, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0804-8127
Charles LinSilicon Therapeutics LLC, Boston, Massachusetts 02111, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5461-6690
Brian K RadakSilicon Therapeutics LLC, Boston, Massachusetts 02111, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8628-5972
Yujun TaoLaboratory for Biomolecular Simulation Research, Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine and Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4520-941X
Hsu-Chun TsaiLaboratory for Biomolecular Simulation Research, Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine and Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7027-5649
Woody ShermanSilicon Therapeutics LLC, Boston, Massachusetts 02111, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9079-1376
Darrin M YorkLaboratory for Biomolecular Simulation Research, Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine and Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9193-7055

Funding

Next-generation integrated quantum force fields for biomedical applicationsR01GM107485 · NIGMS · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI Darrin M York · 2015 to 2026
$3.8M
Supercomputing: Rutgers' Catalyst for Discovery at the Frontiers of MedicineS10OD012346 · OD · RBHS-NEW JERSEY MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI MICHELSON, LESLIE PAUL · 2015 to 2015
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM107485NIH HHS S10 OD012346
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Progress in the development of GPU-accelerated free energy simulation software has enabled practical applications on complex biological systems and fueled efforts to develop more accurate and robust predictive methods. In particular, this work re-examines concerted (a.k.a., one-step or unified) alchemical transformations commonly used in the prediction of hydration and relative binding free energies (RBFEs). We first classify several known challenges in these calculations into three categories: endpoint catastrophes, particle collapse, and large gradient-jumps. While endpoint catastrophes have long been addressed using softcore potentials, the remaining two problems occur much more sporadically and can result in either numerical instability (i.e., complete failure of a simulation) or inconsistent estimation (i.e., stochastic convergence to an incorrect result). The particle collapse problem stems from an imbalance in short-range electrostatic and repulsive interactions and can, in principle, be solved by appropriately balancing the respective softcore parameters. However, the large gradient-jump problem itself arises from the sensitivity of the free energy to large values of the softcore parameters, as might be used in trying to solve the particle collapse issue. Often, no satisfactory compromise exists with the existing softcore potential form. As a framework for solving these problems, we developed a new family of smoothstep softcore (SSC) potentials motivated by an analysis of the derivatives along the alchemical path. The smoothstep polynomials generalize the monomial functions that are used in most implementations and provide an additional path-dependent smoothing parameter. The effectiveness of this approach is demonstrated on simple yet pathological cases that illustrate the three problems outlined. With appropriate parameter selection, we find that a second-order SSC(2) potential does at least as well as the conventional approach and provides vast improvement in terms of consistency across all cases. Last, we compare the concerted SSC(2) approach against the gold-standard stepwise (a.k.a., decoupled or multistep) scheme over a large set of RBFE calculations as might be encountered in drug discovery.

Identifiers

PMID32672455
PMCPMC7494069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.