Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32672330›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of clinical nutrition2020

Anthropometric data quality assessment in multisurvey studies of child growth.

Nandita Perumal, Sorrel Namaste, Huma Qamar, Ashley Aimone, Diego G Bassani, Daniel E Roth

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Metadata integrity in bioinformatics: Bridging the gap between data and knowledge.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A roadmap to reduce stunting.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nandita PerumalDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Sorrel NamasteThe DHS Program, ICF, Rockville, MD, USA.
Huma QamarCentre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ashley AimoneDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Diego G BassaniCentre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Daniel E RothCentre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
University of Toronto · CAHospital for Sick Children · CAICF International (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPopulation-based surveys collect crucial data on anthropometric measures to track trends in stunting [height-for-age z score (HAZ) < -2SD] and wasting [weight-for-height z score (WHZ) < -2SD] prevalence among young children globally. However, the quality of the anthropometric data varies between surveys, which may affect population-based estimates of malnutrition.

objectivesWe aimed to develop composite indices of anthropometric data quality for use in multisurvey analysis of child health and nutritional status.

methodsWe used anthropometric data for children 0-59 mo of age from all publicly available Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) from 2000 onwards. We derived 6 indicators of anthropometric data quality at the survey level, including 1) date of birth completeness, 2) anthropometric measure completeness, 3) digit preference for height and age, 4) difference in mean HAZ by month of birth, 5) proportion of biologically implausible values, and 6) dispersion of HAZ and WHZ distribution. Principal component factor analysis was used to generate a composite index of anthropometric data quality for HAZ and WHZ separately. Surveys were ranked from the highest (best) to the lowest (worst) index values in anthropometric quality across countries and over time.

resultsOf the 145 DHS included, the majority (83 of 145; 57%) were conducted in Sub-Saharan Africa. Surveys were ranked from highest to lowest anthropometric data quality relative to other surveys using the composite index for HAZ. Although slightly higher values in recent DHS suggest potential improvements in anthropometric data quality over time, there continues to be substantial heterogeneity in the quality of anthropometric data across surveys. Results were similar for the WHZ data quality index.

conclusionsA composite index of anthropometric data quality using a parsimonious set of individual indicators can effectively discriminate among surveys with excellent and poor data quality. Such indices can be used to account for variations in anthropometric data quality in multisurvey epidemiologic analyses of child health.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentAnthropometryBody HeightBody WeightChild, PreschoolData AccuracyData MiningFemaleGrowth DisordersHumansInfantMaleNutritional Statusanthropometrydata qualityDemographic and Health Surveysheight-for-age z scorestuntingwastingweight-for-height z score

Identifiers

PMID32672330
PMCPMC7487428
OpenAlexW3043577348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.