Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32671911›Full record

ArticleMolecular oncology2020

A robust multiplex immunofluorescence and digital pathology workflow for the characterisation of the tumour immune microenvironment.

Amélie Viratham Pulsawatdi, Stephanie G Craig, Victoria Bingham, Kris McCombe, Matthew P Humphries, Seedevi Senevirathne, Susan D Richman, Phil Quirke, Leticia Campo, Enric Domingo and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. The two souls of pathology-ready for biomarker complexity.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Amélie Viratham PulsawatdiPatrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Stephanie G CraigPatrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Victoria BinghamPatrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Kris McCombePatrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Matthew P HumphriesPatrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Seedevi SenevirathnePatrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Susan D RichmanLeeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Phil QuirkeLeeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Leticia CampoCRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
Enric DomingoCRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
Timothy S MaughanCRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
Jacqueline A JamesPatrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Manuel Salto-TellezPatrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8586-282X
Queen's University Belfast · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 20256Cancer Research UK C11512/A20256Department of HealthMedical Research Council MR/M016587/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiplex immunofluorescence is a powerful tool for the simultaneous detection of tissue-based biomarkers, revolutionising traditional immunohistochemistry. The Opal methodology allows up to eight biomarkers to be measured concomitantly without cross-reactivity, permitting identification of different cell populations within the tumour microenvironment. In this study, we aimed to validate a multiplex immunofluorescence workflow in two complementary multiplex panels and evaluate the tumour immune microenvironment in colorectal cancer (CRC) formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue. We stained CRC and tonsil samples using Opal multiplex immunofluorescence on a Leica BOND RX immunostainer. We then acquired images on an Akoya Vectra Polaris and performed multispectral unmixing using inform. Antibody panels were validated on tissue microarray sections containing cores from six normal tissue types, using qupath for image analysis. Comparisons between chromogenic immunohistochemistry and multiplex immunofluorescence on consecutive sections from the same tissue microarray showed significant correlation (r

Indexed as

Tumor MicroenvironmentWorkflowEpitopesFluorescent Antibody TechniqueHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalReproducibility of ResultsEpitopesimage analysismultiplex immunofluorescenceopal methodology

Identifiers

PMID32671911
PMCPMC7530793
OpenAlexW3043695311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.