Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32671802›Full record

ReviewJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2020

Liver Transplantation for Peri-hilar Cholangiocarcinoma.

Ek Khoon Tan, Timucin Taner, Julie K Heimbach, Gregory J Gores, Charles B Rosen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. [Klatskin tumors-differentiated surgical treatment].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Present and future of liver transplantation for cholangiocellular carcinoma: moving toward personalized multiparametric transplantability patterns.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026
    Review
  10. Cholangiocarcinoma 2026: status quo, unmet needs and priorities.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ek Khoon TanDepartment of Surgery, Division of Transplantation Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Timucin TanerDepartment of Surgery, Division of Transplantation Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Julie K HeimbachDepartment of Surgery, Division of Transplantation Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Gregory J GoresDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Charles B RosenDepartment of Surgery, Division of Transplantation Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Rosen.Charles@mayo.edu.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLiver transplantation for peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) following neoadjuvant chemoradiation achieves excellent long-term survival in carefully selected patients with early-stage unresectable pCCA and patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC)-associated pCCA. Strict adherence to selection criteria, aggressive neoadjuvant therapy, operative staging prior to transplantation, and several technical accommodations during the transplant operation are necessary for success. In this review, we provide a contemporaneous overview of liver transplantation for pCCA, including selection criteria, neoadjuvant therapy, operative staging, and technical aspects of liver transplantation unique to patients with pCCA and an irradiated operative field. We also discuss several evolving trends intended to improve patient outcomes. RESULTS AND

conclusionIntention-to-treat and patient outcomes after liver transplantation for PSC-associated pCCA are superior to de novo pCCA. Outcomes between living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and deceased donor liver transplantation are similar for patients with PSC-associated pCCA. However, LDLT for de novo pCCA shows a trend toward more disease recurrence and worse patient survival. A period of waiting time before transplant may be beneficial in selecting for patients with superior outcomes after transplant. Compared with liver transplantation for other indications, there is an increased risk of late arterial and portal vein complications, presumably due to the radiation. However, with close follow-up and prompt intervention for vascular complications, graft loss can be avoided. Neoadjuvant therapy and liver transplantation can achieve results comparable with resection for patients with early-stage unresectable pCCA and is the treatment of choice for patients with pCCA arising in the setting of PSC.

Indexed as

Bile Duct NeoplasmsCholangiocarcinomaKlatskin TumorLiver TransplantationBile Ducts, IntrahepaticHumansLiving DonorsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalLiver transplantationNeoadjuvant therapyPerihilar cholangiocarcinoma

Identifiers

PMID32671802
OpenAlexW3043647586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.