Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32671694›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical review2021

Electrophysiological predictors of hearing deterioration based on AEP monitoring during petroclival meningioma resection.

Guilherme Lepski, Analía Arévalo, Florian Roser, M Liebsch, Marcos Tatagiba

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical review, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Guilherme LepskiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Eberhard Karls University, Hoppe-Seyler Strasse 3, 72076, Tubingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9030-4192
Analía ArévaloDepartment of Neurology, Medical School, Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil, Av Dr Arnaldo Vieira de Carvalho 455, Sao Paulo, Brazil. analia.l.arevalo@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3793-8081
Florian RoserDepartment of Neurosurgery, Eberhard Karls University, Hoppe-Seyler Strasse 3, 72076, Tubingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7854-6789
M LiebschDepartment of Neurosurgery, Eberhard Karls University, Hoppe-Seyler Strasse 3, 72076, Tubingen, Germany.
Marcos TatagibaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Eberhard Karls University, Hoppe-Seyler Strasse 3, 72076, Tubingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1627-9937
University of Tübingen · DEUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to calculate the risk of postsurgical hearing deterioration as a function of changes in the amplitude and latency of the most stable components (waves III and V) of the auditory evoked potential (AEP) during petroclival meningioma resection surgery. We retrospectively analyzed intraoperative AEP monitoring results and pre- and postsurgical hearing status in 40 consecutive patients who were surgically treated for petroclival meningiomas. Statistical analyses were conducted to identify the most sensitive and specific way to predict hearing dysfunction after surgery. Patients' mean age was 59 ± 10 years, and 31 (77.5%) were women. Twelve (30%) patients presented with clinically detectable hearing impairment preoperatively. At the first postoperative assessment, four of those 12 patients reported subjective improvement, and eight reported hearing deterioration. Of those eight, four remained stable and four recovered hearing by the last assessment. Wave III latency reached its highest specificity (100%) and sensitivity (71.43%) at x = 143%. Wave V latency, on the other hand, reached its highest sensitivity (71%) and specificity (93%) at x = 124%. Finally, wave V amplitude reached its highest sensitivity (100%) and specificity (79%) at x = 74%. Intraoperative alterations of wave III latency and wave V amplitude seem to be highly sensitive and specific at predicting the risk of auditory dysfunction in patients undergoing petroclival meningioma resection and should be used to determine maximum resection with preservation of function.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCranial Fossa, PosteriorEvoked Potentials, AuditoryFemaleHearingHearing LossHearing TestsHumansMaleMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaMiddle AgedMonitoring, IntraoperativeNeurosurgical ProceduresPredictive Value of TestsAuditory evoked potentialBrain tumorIntraoperative monitoringPetroclival meningiomaPredictors of hearing deteriorationSkull base

Identifiers

PMID32671694
OpenAlexW3043061291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.