Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32671693›Full record

ReviewNeurosurgical review2021

Intracranial anaplastic solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma: immunohistochemical markers for definitive diagnosis.

Daisuke Yamashita, Satoshi Suehiro, Shohei Kohno, Shiro Ohue, Yawara Nakamura, Daisuke Kouno, Yoshihiro Ohtsuka, Masahiro Nishikawa, Shirabe Matsumoto, Joshua D Bernstock and 5 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neurosurgical review, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Solitary fibrous tumor: an updated review.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Solitary fibrous tumor in the pineal region: A series of 5 cases and literature review.Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Daisuke YamashitaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, 454 Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime, 791-0295, Japan. yamadai551208@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5829-7287
Satoshi SuehiroDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, 454 Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime, 791-0295, Japan.
Shohei KohnoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, 454 Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime, 791-0295, Japan.
Shiro OhueDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, 454 Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime, 791-0295, Japan.
Yawara NakamuraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, 454 Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime, 791-0295, Japan.
Daisuke KounoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, 454 Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime, 791-0295, Japan.
Yoshihiro OhtsukaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, 454 Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime, 791-0295, Japan.
Masahiro NishikawaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, 454 Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime, 791-0295, Japan.
Shirabe MatsumotoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, 454 Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime, 791-0295, Japan.
Joshua D BernstockDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.
Shuko HaradaDepartment of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Yosuke MizunoDivision of Diagnostic Pathology, Ehime University Hospital, Toon, Ehime, Japan.
Riko KitazawaDivision of Diagnostic Pathology, Ehime University Hospital, Toon, Ehime, Japan.
Takanori OhnishiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, 454 Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime, 791-0295, Japan.
Takeharu KuniedaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, 454 Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime, 791-0295, Japan.
Ehime University · JPEhime University Hospital · JPBrigham and Women's Hospital · USEhime Prefectural Central Hospital · JPHimeji Red Cross Hospital · JPSaiseikai Matsuyama Hospital · JPUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intracranial anaplastic hemangiopericytoma (AHPC) is a rare and malignant subset of solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma (SFT/HPC) as per the WHO 2016 Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System. AHPC portends a poor prognosis and is associated with higher rates of recurrence/metastasis in comparison with SFT/HPC. Accordingly, it is critical to continue to define the clinical course of patients with AHPC and in so doing further refine clinicopathologic/immunohistochemical (IHC) criteria needed for definitive diagnosis. Herein, we describe clinical/histological characteristics of six patients with AHPC. In addition, we reviewed and analyzed the expression of various IHC markers reported within the literature (i.e., a total of 354 intracranial SFT/HPCs and 460 meningiomas). Histologically, tumors from our six patients were characterized by a staghorn-like vascular pattern, mitotic cells, and strong nuclear atypia. Immunohistochemically, all tumors displayed positive nuclear staining for STAT6; other markers, including CD34 and Bcl-2, were expressed only in three patients. Analysis of IHC expression patterns for SFT/HPC and meningioma within the literature revealed that nuclear expression of STAT6 had the highest specificity (100%) for SFT/HPC, followed by ALDH1 (97.2%) and CD34 (93.6%). Of note, SSTR2A (95.2%) and EMA (85%) displayed a high specificity for meningioma. Anaplastic SFT/HPC is a tumor with poor prognosis that is associated with higher rates of recurrence and metastasis in comparison with SFT/HPC. Given that anaplastic SFT/HPC requires more aggressive treatment than meningioma despite of a similar presentation on imaging, it is crucial to be able to distinguish between these tumors.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHemangiopericytomaHumansMaleMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalSolitary Fibrous TumorsSTAT6 Transcription FactorBiomarkers, TumorSTAT6 protein, humanSTAT6 Transcription FactorAnaplasticHemangiopericytomaMeningiomaSolitary fibrous tumorSTAT6

Identifiers

PMID32671693
OpenAlexW3043535166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.