Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32671683›Full record

ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2021

Analysis of 4,015 recurrent incisional hernia repairs from the Herniamed registry: risk factors and outcomes.

H Hoffmann, F Köckerling, D Adolf, F Mayer, D Weyhe, W Reinpold, R Fortelny, P Kirchhoff

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Adhesions After Laparoscopic IPOM-How Serious Is the Problem?Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Anarchy in abdominal wall surgery: a serious ethical and socio-economical issue. LAST CALL!Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. [Ventral hernias part 1 : Operative treatment techniques].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

H Hoffmann *ZweiChirurgen GmbH-Center for Hernia Surgery and Proctology, St. Johanns-Vorstadt 44, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.
F Köckerling *Department of Surgery and Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Academic Teaching Hospital of Charité Medical School, Vivantes Hospital, Neue Bergstrasse 6, 13585, Berlin, Germany. ferdinand.koeckerling@vivantes.de.
D AdolfStatConsult GmbH, Halberstädter Strasse 40 a, 39112, Magdeburg, Germany.
F MayerDepartment of Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, University Hospital of Salzburg, Müllner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
D WeyheDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery Pius Hospital, University Hospital of Visceral Surgery, Georgstraße 12, 26121, Oldenburg, Germany.
W ReinpoldDepartment of Surgery, Wilhelmsburger Hospital Groß Sand, Academic Teaching Hospital of University Hamburg, Groß Sand 3, 21107, Hamburg, Germany.
R FortelnyDepartment of General Surgery, Medical Faculty, Wilhelminen Hospital, Sigmund Freud University Vienna, Freudplatz 3, 1020, Vienna, Austria.
P KirchhoffZweiChirurgen GmbH-Center for Hernia Surgery and Proctology, St. Johanns-Vorstadt 44, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.
Hirslanden Klinik Birshof · CHCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEInfoConsult (Germany) · DEParacelsus Medical University · ATPius Hospital Oldenburg · DESigmund Freud University Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe proportion of recurrences in the total collective of all incisional hernias has been reported to be around 25%. In the European Hernia Society (EHS) classification, recurrent incisional hernias are assigned to a unique prognostic group and considered as complex abdominal wall hernias. Surgical repairs are characterized by dense adhesions, flawed anatomical planes caused by previous dissection or mesh use, and device-related complications. To date, only relatively small case series have been published focusing on outcomes following recurrent incisional hernia repair. This cohort study now analyzes the outcome of recurrent incisional hernia repair assessing potential risk factors based on data from the Herniamed registry. Special attention is paid to the technique used during the primary incisional hernia repair, since laparoscopic IPOM was recently deemed to cause more complications during subsequent repairs.

methodsIn the multicenter Internet-based Herniamed registry, patients with recurrent incisional hernia repair between September 2009 and January 2018 were enrolled. In a confirmatory multivariable analysis, factors potentially associated with the outcome parameters (intraoperative, postoperative and general complications, complication-related reoperations, re-recurrences, pain at rest and on exertion, and chronic pain requiring treatment at one-year follow-up) were evaluated.

resultsIn total, 4015 patients from 712 participating hospitals were included. Postoperative complications and complication-related reoperations were significantly associated with larger recurrent hernia defect size, open recurrent incisional hernia repair and the use of larger meshes. General complications were more frequent in female sex patients and when larger meshes were used. Higher re-recurrence rate was observed with lateral defect localization, present risk factors, and time interval ≤ 1 year between primary and recurrent incisional hernia repair. Pain rates at 1-year follow-up were unfavorably related with pre-existing preoperative pain, female sex, lateral defect localization, larger mesh, presence of risk factors, and postoperative complications. As regards the primary incisional hernia repair technique, laparoscopic IPOM was found to show no effect versus open mesh techniques on the subsequent recurrence repair, despite a trend toward higher rates of complication-related reoperations.

conclusionThe outcomes of recurrent incisional hernia repair were significantly associated with potential influencing factors, which are very similar to the factors seen in primary incisional hernia repair. The impact of the primary incisional hernia repair technique, namely laparoscopic IPOM versus open mesh techniques, on the outcome of recurrent incisional hernia repair seems less pronounced than anticipated.

Indexed as

Chronic PainHernia, VentralIncisional HerniaLaparoscopyCohort StudiesFemaleHerniorrhaphyHumansPostoperative ComplicationsRecurrenceRegistriesRisk FactorsSurgical MeshChronic painComplicationsOutcomesRecurrent incisional herniaRe-recurrence

Identifiers

PMID32671683
OpenAlexW3042963429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.