ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2021
Analysis of 4,015 recurrent incisional hernia repairs from the Herniamed registry: risk factors and outcomes.
Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative clinical efficacy of IPOM and TES in treating midline ventral hernias: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Article
- Management of multi-recurrent giant incisional hernia with loss of domain: a multimodal approach using BTA, PPP, and TAR with peritoneal bridging.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Article
- Clinical application of HEDI for biomechanical evaluation and visualisation in incisional hernia repair.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- Use of intraperitoneal fascial traction in robotic eTEP approach for complex ventral hernias: technique and outcomes.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2026Article
- A literature-based cost-effectiveness analysis of device-assisted suturing versus needle-driven suturing during laparotomy closure.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025Article
- Adhesions After Laparoscopic IPOM-How Serious Is the Problem?Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2025Review
- Case Report: Intraoperative Fascial Traction for Increasing Intra-Abdominal Volume in Loss-of-Domain Incisional Hernias: A Report of Two Cases.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2025Article
- Three-year follow-up of the grip concept: an open, prospective, observational registry study on biomechanically calculated abdominal wall repair for complex incisional hernias.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024Observational
- Risk factors of recurrence after incisional hernia preperitoneal repair: a long-term retrospective single-center cohort study.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2024Article
- Clinical observation of extraction-site incisional hernia after laparoscopic colorectal surgery.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2024Article
- Outcomes of recurrent incisional hernia repair by open and laparoscopic approaches: a propensity score-matched comparison.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2023Article
- Anarchy in abdominal wall surgery: a serious ethical and socio-economical issue. LAST CALL!Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2022Article
- Construction and properties of the silk fibroin and polypropylene composite biological mesh for abdominal incisional hernia repair.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Incisional hernia repair by synthetic mesh prosthesis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a comparative analysis.BMC surgery · 2021Article
- [Ventral hernias part 1 : Operative treatment techniques].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe proportion of recurrences in the total collective of all incisional hernias has been reported to be around 25%. In the European Hernia Society (EHS) classification, recurrent incisional hernias are assigned to a unique prognostic group and considered as complex abdominal wall hernias. Surgical repairs are characterized by dense adhesions, flawed anatomical planes caused by previous dissection or mesh use, and device-related complications. To date, only relatively small case series have been published focusing on outcomes following recurrent incisional hernia repair. This cohort study now analyzes the outcome of recurrent incisional hernia repair assessing potential risk factors based on data from the Herniamed registry. Special attention is paid to the technique used during the primary incisional hernia repair, since laparoscopic IPOM was recently deemed to cause more complications during subsequent repairs.
methodsIn the multicenter Internet-based Herniamed registry, patients with recurrent incisional hernia repair between September 2009 and January 2018 were enrolled. In a confirmatory multivariable analysis, factors potentially associated with the outcome parameters (intraoperative, postoperative and general complications, complication-related reoperations, re-recurrences, pain at rest and on exertion, and chronic pain requiring treatment at one-year follow-up) were evaluated.
resultsIn total, 4015 patients from 712 participating hospitals were included. Postoperative complications and complication-related reoperations were significantly associated with larger recurrent hernia defect size, open recurrent incisional hernia repair and the use of larger meshes. General complications were more frequent in female sex patients and when larger meshes were used. Higher re-recurrence rate was observed with lateral defect localization, present risk factors, and time interval ≤ 1 year between primary and recurrent incisional hernia repair. Pain rates at 1-year follow-up were unfavorably related with pre-existing preoperative pain, female sex, lateral defect localization, larger mesh, presence of risk factors, and postoperative complications. As regards the primary incisional hernia repair technique, laparoscopic IPOM was found to show no effect versus open mesh techniques on the subsequent recurrence repair, despite a trend toward higher rates of complication-related reoperations.
conclusionThe outcomes of recurrent incisional hernia repair were significantly associated with potential influencing factors, which are very similar to the factors seen in primary incisional hernia repair. The impact of the primary incisional hernia repair technique, namely laparoscopic IPOM versus open mesh techniques, on the outcome of recurrent incisional hernia repair seems less pronounced than anticipated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.