ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2020
A new integrated approach to cardiac mechanics: reference values for normal left ventricle.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Apical hypercontractility mitigates impaired diastolic filling and lower intraventricular haemodynamic forces in human bed rest.Experimental physiology · 2026Article
- Sex-Related Differences in Myocardial Deformation and Systolic Function in Healthy Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Global Longitudinal Strain and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Comparison of left ventricular hemodynamic forces measured by transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in healthy adults.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- 2D speckle-tracking echocardiography assessment of left atrial and left ventricular mechanics: outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with hybrid ablation and left atrial appendage surgical closure.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Differences in cardiac mechanics assessed by left ventricular hemodynamic forces in athletes and patients with hypertension.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Prognostic Value of Left Ventricular Myocardial Strain Parameters Derived from Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking Technique in Light-Chain Cardiac Amyloidosis Patients: A Pilot Study.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Assessing cardiac mechanics through left ventricular haemodynamic forces.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2024Review
- Echocardiography-Derived Hemodynamic Forces Are Associated with Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Non-Ischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Unravelling the intricacies of left ventricular haemodynamic forces: age and gender-specific normative values assessed by cardiac MRI in healthy adults.European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging · 2024Article
- Inter-study reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance-derived hemodynamic force assessments.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Haemodynamic forces predicting remodelling and outcome in patients with heart failure treated with sacubitril/valsartan.ESC heart failure · 2023Article
- Prognostic value of echocardiographic evaluation of cardiac mechanics in patients with aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2023Article
- Acute Modification of Hemodynamic Forces in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Comparison of left ventricular global and segmental strain parameters by cardiovascular magnetic resonance tissue tracking in light-chain cardiac amyloidosis and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Longitudinal CMR assessment of cardiac global longitudinal strain and hemodynamic forces in a mouse model of heart failure.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2022Article
- Surrogate models provide new insights on metrics based on blood flow for the assessment of left ventricular function.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Acute coronary syndrome versus acute myocarditis in young adults-value of speckle tracking echocardiography.PloS one · 2022Article
- Introduction to Hemodynamic Forces Analysis: Moving Into the New Frontier of Cardiac Deformation Analysis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2021Article
- Reference Ranges of Left Ventricular Hemodynamic Forces in Healthy Adults: A Speckle-Tracking Echocardiographic Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The association between left ventricular (LV) myocardial deformation and hemodynamic forces is still mostly unexplored. The normative values and the effects of demographic and technical factors on hemodynamic forces are not known. The authors studied the association between LV myocardial deformation and hemodynamic forces in a large cohort of healthy volunteers. One-hundred seventy-six consecutive subjects (age range, 16-82; 51% women), with no cardiovascular risk factors or any relevant diseases, were enrolled. All subjects underwent an echo-Doppler examination. Both 2D global myocardial and endocardial longitudinal strain (GLS), circumferential strain (GCS), and the hemodynamic forces were measured with new software that enabled to calculate all these values and parameters from the three apical views. Higher LV mass index and larger LV volumes were found in males compared to females (85 ± 17 vs 74 ± 15 g/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.