Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32671472›Full record

ReviewHerzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie2020

[Twitter in cardiology : Tips and tricks].

Dominik Linz, David Duncker

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Researchers in cardiology - Why and how to get on Twitter?International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2022
    Review
  3. The impact of Twitter promotion on future citation rates: The #TweetTheJournal study.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2021
    Article
  4. [Current status of cardiac electrophysiology training in Germany].Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2020
    Article
  5. [Starting cardiac electrophysiology-practical guidance].Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dominik LinzMaastricht Heart+Vascular Center, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), 6202 AZ, Maastricht, Niederlande. dominik.linz@mumc.nl.
David DunckerRhythmologie und Elektrophysiologie, Klinik für Kardiologie und Angiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland. duncker.david@mh-hannover.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social media is becoming increasingly popular in the cardiology community. Particularly Twitter is an emerging and dynamic medium to communicate, connect and educate academic and clinical cardiologists. This article aims to provide a practical guide how to professionally use this social network to keep yourself up-to-date about new techniques, the latest study results and news presented at national or international conferences.

Indexed as

CardiologySocial MediaCardiology communityCommunicationContinuing educationNetworkingSocial Media

Identifiers

PMID32671472
PMCPMC7360694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.