Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32671398›Full record

Observational studyPhysical therapy2020

6-Minute Push Test in Youth Who Have Spina Bifida and Who Self-Propel a Wheelchair: Reliability and Physiologic Response.

Karlijn M S Damen, Tim Takken, Janke F de Groot, Frank J G Backx, Bob Radder, Irene C P M Roos, Manon A T Bloemen

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Physical therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Karlijn M S DamenResearch Group Lifestyle and Health, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 7, Postbus 12011, 3501 AA Utrecht, the Netherlands; and Master Program Physiotherapy, Specialisation Paediatric Physiotherapy, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht.
Tim TakkenChild Development & Exercise Center, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Janke F de GrootResearch Group Lifestyle and Health, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht and Child Development & Exercise Center, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht.
Frank J G BackxDepartment of Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy Science and Sports, University Medical Center Utrecht.
Bob RadderResearch Group Lifestyle and Health, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht; and Child Development & Exercise Center, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht.
Irene C P M RoosResearch Group Lifestyle and Health, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht and Child Development & Exercise Center, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht.
Manon A T BloemenResearch Group Lifestyle and Health, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht; Master Program Physiotherapy, Specialisation Paediatric Physiotherapy, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht; and Child Development & Exercise Center, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht.
Wilhelmina Children's Hospital · NLUniversity of Applied Sciences Utrecht · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDespite the common occurrence of lower levels of physical activity and physical fitness in youth with spina bifida (SB) who use a wheelchair, there are very few tests available to measure and assess these levels. The purpose of this study was to determine reliability and the physiologic response of the 6-minute push test (6MPT) in youth with SB who self-propel a wheelchair.

methodsIn this reliability and observational study, a sample of 53 youth with SB (5-19 years old; mean age = 13 years 7 months; 32 boys and 21 girls) who used a wheelchair performed 2 exercise tests: the 6MPT and shuttle ride test. Heart rate, minute ventilation, respiratory exchange ratio, and oxygen consumption were measured using a calibrated mobile gas analysis system and a heart rate monitor. For reliability, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), SE of measurement, smallest detectable change for total covered distance, minute work, and heart rate were calculated. Physiologic response during the 6MPT was expressed as percentage of maximal values achieved during the shuttle ride test.

resultsThe ICCs for total distance and minute work were excellent (0.95 and 0.97, respectively), and the ICC for heart rate was good (0.81). The physiologic response during the 6MPT was 85% to 89% of maximal values, except for minute ventilation (70.6%).

conclusionsFor most youth with SB who use a wheelchair for mobility or sports participation, the 6MPT is a reliable, functional performance test on a vigorous level of exercise. IMPACT: This is the first study to investigate physiologic response during the 6MPT in youth (with SB) who are wheelchair using. Clinicians can use the 6MPT to evaluate functional performance and help design effective exercise programs for youth with SB who are wheelchair using.

Indexed as

WheelchairsAdolescentChildExercise TestFemaleHumansMaleOxygen ConsumptionPhysical FitnessReproducibility of ResultsSpinal Dysraphism6-minute push testadolescentdisabled childrenspinal diseaseswheelchairs

Identifiers

PMID32671398
PMCPMC7530576
OpenAlexW3043051556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.