Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32671351›Full record

ArticleCritical care explorations2020

Proposal for Coronavirus Disease 2019 Management.

John B Downs, Barry Weled, Jukka Räsänen, Krista L Haines, Dharmapuri Vidyasagar, M Christine Stock, Nader Habashi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care explorations, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

John B DownsDepartments of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL.
Barry WeledFranciscan Medical Center Tacoma Washington, Tacoma, WA.
Jukka RäsänenMayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN.
Krista L HainesDepartment of Surgery, Trauma and Critical Care Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC.
Dharmapuri VidyasagarDivision of Neonatology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL.
M Christine StockNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Nader HabashiUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Multi-Trauma Critical Care Unit, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Unit, Baltimore, MD.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

settingThe coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has raised fear throughout the nation. Current news and social media predictions of ventilator, medication, and personnel shortages are rampant. PATIENTS: Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 are presenting with early respiratory distress and hypoxemia, but not hypercapnia.

interventionsPatients who maintain adequate alveolar ventilation, normocapnia, and adequate oxygenation may avoid the need for tracheal intubation. Facemask continuous positive airway pressure has been used to treat patients with respiratory distress for decades, including those with severe acute respiratory syndrome. Of importance, protocols were successful in protecting caregivers from contracting the virus, obviating the need for tracheal intubation just to limit the spread of potentially infectious particles.

conclusionsDuring a pandemic, with limited resources, we should provide the safest and most effective care, while protecting caregivers. Continuous positive airway pressure titrated to an effective level and applied early with a facemask may spare ventilator usage. Allowing spontaneous ventilation will decrease the need for sedative and paralytic drugs and may decrease the need for highly skilled nurses and respiratory therapists. These goals can be accomplished with devices that are readily available and easier to obtain than mechanical ventilators, which then can be reserved for the sickest patients.

Indexed as

continuous positive airway pressurecoronavirus disease 2019hypoxemia

Identifiers

PMID32671351
PMCPMC7259560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.