Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32671345›Full record

ArticleCritical care explorations2020

The Impact of Step-Down Unit Care on Patient Outcomes After ICU Discharge.

Suparerk Lekwijit, Carri W Chan, Linda V Green, Vincent X Liu, Gabriel J Escobar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care explorations, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. [A clinical study of high dependency units to reduce ICU readmission rates in patients with severe liver disease].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Readmission into intensive care unit in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.Journal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Suparerk LekwijitOperations, Information and Decisions Department, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Carri W ChanDecision, Risk and Operations Division, Columbia Business School, New York, NY.
Linda V GreenDecision, Risk and Operations Division, Columbia Business School, New York, NY.
Vincent X LiuDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA.
Gabriel J EscobarDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA.

Funding

Identifying pre-sepsis opportunities for early, targeted intervention - Equipment SupplementR35GM128672 · NIGMS · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Vincent Liu · 2018 to 2026
$4.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM128672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo examine whether and how step-down unit admission after ICU discharge affects patient outcomes.

designRetrospective study using an instrumental variable approach to remove potential biases from unobserved differences in illness severity for patients admitted to the step-down unit after ICU discharge.

settingTen hospitals in an integrated healthcare delivery system in Northern California. PATIENTS: Eleven-thousand fifty-eight episodes involving patients who were admitted via emergency departments to a medical service from July 2010 to June 2011, were admitted to the ICU at least once during their hospitalization, and were discharged from the ICU to the step-down unit or the ward.

interventionsNone. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsUsing congestion in the step-down unit as an instrumental variable, we quantified the impact of step-down unit care in terms of clinical and operational outcomes. On average, for ICU patients with lower illness severity, we found that availability of step-down unit care was associated with an absolute decrease in the likelihood of hospital readmission within 30 days of 3.9% (95% CI, 3.6-4.1%). We did not find statistically significant effects on other outcomes. For ICU patients with higher illness severity, we found that availability of step-down unit care was associated with an absolute decrease in in-hospital mortality of 2.5% (95% CI, 2.3-2.6%), a decrease in remaining hospital length-of-stay of 1.1 days (95% CI, 1.0-1.2 d), and a decrease in the likelihood of ICU readmission within 5 days of 3.6% (95% CI, 3.3-3.8%).

conclusionsThis study shows that there exists a subset of patients discharged from the ICU who may benefit from care in an step-down unit relative to that in the ward. We found that step-down unit care was associated with statistically significant improvements in patient outcomes especially for high-risk patients. Our results suggest that step-down units can provide effective transitional care for ICU patients.

Indexed as

admission decisionhospital bed capacityhospital length of staypatient readmissionquality of healthcarestep-down unittransitional care

Identifiers

PMID32671345
PMCPMC7259559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.