Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32671339›Full record

ArticleBrain communications2020

Quantifying epileptogenesis in rats with spontaneous and responsive brain state dynamics.

Dakota N Crisp, Warwick Cheung, Stephen V Gliske, Alan Lai, Dean R Freestone, David B Grayden, Mark J Cook, William C Stacey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dakota N CrispDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, BioInterfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Warwick CheungDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia.
Stephen V GliskeDepartment of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Alan LaiDepartment of Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3065, Australia.
Dean R FreestoneDepartment of Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3065, Australia.
David B GraydenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia.
Mark J CookDepartment of Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3065, Australia.
William C StaceyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, BioInterfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8359-8057

Funding

Characterizing High Frequency Oscillations as an epilepsy biomarker with Big Data toolsR01NS094399 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI STACEY, WILLIAM CHARLES · 2015 to 2025
$4.1M
Epileptic biomarkers and big data: identifying brain regions to resect in patients with refractory epilepsyK01ES026839 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GLISKE, STEPHEN V · 2015 to 2019
$734k
NIEHS NIH HHS K01 ES026839NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS094399
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a crucial need to identify biomarkers of epileptogenesis that will help predict later development of seizures. This work identifies two novel electrophysiological biomarkers that quantify epilepsy progression in a rat model of epileptogenesis. The long-term tetanus toxin rat model was used to show the development and remission of epilepsy over several weeks. We measured the response to periodic electrical stimulation and features of spontaneous seizure dynamics over several weeks. Both biomarkers showed dramatic changes during epileptogenesis. Electrically induced responses began to change several days before seizures began and continued to change until seizures resolved. These changes were consistent across animals and allowed development of an algorithm that could differentiate which animals would later develop epilepsy. Once seizures began, there was a progression of seizure dynamics that closely follows recent theoretical predictions, suggesting that the underlying brain state was changing over time. This research demonstrates that induced electrical responses and seizure onset dynamics are useful biomarkers to quantify dynamical changes in epileptogenesis. These tools hold promise for robust quantification of the underlying epileptogenicity and prediction of later development of seizures.

Indexed as

biomarkerdynamicsepileptogenesisevoked responsesseizures

Identifiers

PMID32671339
PMCPMC7331126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.