ArticleHeliyon2020
Researching unexplained phenomena: empirical-statistical validity and reliability of the Multivariable Multiaxial Suggestibility Inventory-2 (MMSI-2).
Article in Heliyon, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Placebo effects in alternative medical treatments for anxiety: false hope or healing potential?CNS spectrums · 2025Trial
- Quantum evidence of nonlocal consciousness during clinical death.Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2026Article
- Quality-checking a novel "fact sheet" on ghostly episodes.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Personality and misinformation.Current opinion in psychology · 2024Review
- Follow-up on the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency's (CIA) remote viewing experimentsBrain and behavior · 2023Article
- Who falls for fake news? Psychological and clinical profiling evidence of fake news consumers.Personality and individual differences · 2023Article
- 'Feeling' or 'sensing' the future? Testing for anomalous cognitions in clinical versus healthy populations.Heliyon · 2022Article
- Impact of conspiracist ideation and psychotic-like experiences in patients with schizophrenia during the COVID-19 crisis.Journal of psychiatric research · 2022Article
- Paranormal belief and well-being: The moderating roles of transliminality and psychopathology-related facets.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Critical thinking predicts reductions in Spanish physicians' stress levels and promotes fake news detection.Thinking skills and creativity · 2021Article
- The Multivariable Multiaxial Suggestibility Inventory-2 (MMSI-2): A Psychometric Alternative to Measure and Explain Supernatural Experiences.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Pseudoscientific beliefs and psychopathological risks increase after COVID-19 social quarantine.Globalization and health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anomalous phenomena are unexplained occurrences, such as paranormal experiences, that challenge the ontological bases of current scientific knowledge and are considered scientifically impossible. Problematically, some scientific research yields significant statistical results in favor of the existence of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.