Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32671054›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2020

Toward Engineering Biosystems With Emergent Collective Functions.

Thomas E Gorochowski, Sabine Hauert, Jan-Ulrich Kreft, Lucia Marucci, Namid R Stillman, T-Y Dora Tang, Lucia Bandiera, Vittorio Bartoli, Daniel O R Dixon, Alex J H Fedorec and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Generative models of morphogenesis in developmental biology.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Thomas E GorochowskiSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Sabine HauertDepartment of Engineering Mathematics, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Jan-Ulrich KreftSchool of Biosciences and Institute of Microbiology and Infection and Centre for Computational Biology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Lucia MarucciDepartment of Engineering Mathematics, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Namid R StillmanDepartment of Engineering Mathematics, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
T-Y Dora TangMax Plank Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany.
Lucia BandieraSchool of Engineering, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Vittorio BartoliDepartment of Engineering Mathematics, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Daniel O R DixonSchool of Biochemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Alex J H FedorecDivision of Biosciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Harold FellermannSchool of Computing, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Alexander G FletcherBateson Centre and School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Tim FosterSchool of Biosciences and Institute of Microbiology and Infection and Centre for Computational Biology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Luca GiuggioliDepartment of Engineering Mathematics, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Antoni MatyjaszkiewiczThe European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Barcelona, Spain.
Scott McCormickDepartment of Engineering Mathematics, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Sandra Montes OlivasDepartment of Engineering Mathematics, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Jonathan NaylorSchool of Computing, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Ana Rubio DennissDepartment of Engineering Mathematics, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Daniel WardSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L01386X/1Medical Research Council MR/N021444/1National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research NC/K000683/1National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research NC/R001707/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many complex behaviors in biological systems emerge from large populations of interacting molecules or cells, generating functions that go beyond the capabilities of the individual parts. Such collective phenomena are of great interest to bioengineers due to their robustness and scalability. However, engineering emergent collective functions is difficult because they arise as a consequence of complex multi-level feedback, which often spans many length-scales. Here, we present a perspective on how some of these challenges could be overcome by using multi-agent modeling as a design framework within synthetic biology. Using case studies covering the construction of synthetic ecologies to biological computation and synthetic cellularity, we show how multi-agent modeling can capture the core features of complex multi-scale systems and provide novel insights into the underlying mechanisms which guide emergent functionalities across scales. The ability to unravel design rules underpinning these behaviors offers a means to take synthetic biology beyond single molecules or cells and toward the creation of systems with functions that can only emerge from collectives at multiple scales.

Indexed as

bioengineeringcollectivesconsortiaemergencemulti-agent modelingmulti-scalesynthetic biologysystems biology

Identifiers

PMID32671054
PMCPMC7332988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.