Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32670853›Full record

ReviewVeterinary medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2014

Challenges and prospects for the control of foot-and-mouth disease: an African perspective.

Francois F Maree, Christopher J Kasanga, Katherine A Scott, Pamela A Opperman, Chitray Melanie, Abraham K Sangula, Sallu Raphael, Sinkala Yona, Philemon N Wambura, Donald P King and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Veterinary medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Francois F MareeTransboundary Animal Diseases Programme, Onderstepoort Veterinary Institute, Agricultural Research Council, Onderstepoort, Pretoria, South Africa.
Christopher J KasangaSouthern African Centre for Infectious Diseases Surveillance, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania.
Katherine A ScottTransboundary Animal Diseases Programme, Onderstepoort Veterinary Institute, Agricultural Research Council, Onderstepoort, Pretoria, South Africa.
Pamela A OppermanTransboundary Animal Diseases Programme, Onderstepoort Veterinary Institute, Agricultural Research Council, Onderstepoort, Pretoria, South Africa.
Chitray MelanieTransboundary Animal Diseases Programme, Onderstepoort Veterinary Institute, Agricultural Research Council, Onderstepoort, Pretoria, South Africa.
Abraham K SangulaFoot-and-Mouth Disease Laboratory, Embakasi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Sallu RaphaelSouthern African Centre for Infectious Diseases Surveillance, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania.
Sinkala YonaDepartment of Disease Control, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Philemon N WamburaSouthern African Centre for Infectious Diseases Surveillance, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania.
Donald P KingThe Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, Surrey, UK.
David J PatonThe Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, Surrey, UK.
Mark M RweyemamuSouthern African Centre for Infectious Diseases Surveillance, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania.
Onderstepoort Veterinary Institute · ZASokoine University of Agriculture · TZThe Pirbright Institute · GBSouthern African Centre for Infectious Disease Surveillance · TZUniversity of Pretoria · ZAUniversity of Zambia · ZM

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The epidemiology of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) in Africa is unique in the sense that six of the seven serotypes of FMD viruses (Southern African Territories [SAT] 1, SAT2, SAT3, A, O, and C), with the exception of Asia-1, have occurred in the last decade. Due to underreporting of FMD, the current strains circulating throughout sub-Saharan Africa are in many cases unknown. For SAT1, SAT2, and serotype A viruses, the genetic diversity is reflected in antigenic variation, and indications are that vaccine strains may be needed for each topotype. This has serious implications for control using vaccines and for choice of strains to include in regional antigen banks. The epidemiology is further complicated by the fact that SAT1, SAT2, and SAT3 viruses are maintained and spread by wildlife, persistently infecting African buffalo in particular. Although the precise mechanism of transmission of FMD from buffalo to cattle is not well understood, it is facilitated by direct contact between these two species. Once cattle are infected they may maintain SAT infections without the further involvement of buffalo. No single strategy for control of FMD in Africa is applicable. Decision on the most effective regional control strategy should focus on an ecosystem approach, identification of primary endemic areas, animal husbandry practices, climate, and animal movement. Within each ecosystem, human behavior could be integrated in disease control planning. Different regions in sub-Saharan Africa are at different developmental stages and are thus facing unique challenges and priorities in terms of veterinary disease control. Many science-based options targeting improved vaccinology, diagnostics, and other control measures have been described. This review therefore aims to emphasize, on one hand, the progress that has been achieved in the development of new technologies, including research towards improved tailored vaccines, appropriate vaccine strain selection, vaccine potency, and diagnostics, and how it relates to the conditions in Africa. On the other hand, we focus on the unique epidemiological, ecological, livestock farming and marketing, socioeconomic, and governance issues that constrain effective FMD control. Any such new technologies should have the availability of safe livestock products for trade as the ultimate goal.

Indexed as

diagnostic testsfoot-and-mouth disease virusnew-generation vaccinevaccinevaccine matching

Identifiers

PMID32670853
PMCPMC7337166
OpenAlexW2000471081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.