Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32670675›Full record

ArticleIEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine2020

A Modular Adjustable Transhumeral Prosthetic Socket for Evaluating Myoelectric Control.

Ben W Hallworth, James A Austin, Heather E Williams, Mayank Rehani, Ahmed W Shehata, Jacqueline S Hebert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. 3D printing and prostheses: The current state-of-the-art and future directions.Journal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineering
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ben W HallworthDepartment of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of AlbertaDonadeo Innovation Centre for EngineeringEdmontonABT6G 1H9Canada.
James A AustinDepartment of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of AlbertaDonadeo Innovation Centre for EngineeringEdmontonABT6G 1H9Canada.
Heather E WilliamsDepartment of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of AlbertaDonadeo Innovation Centre for EngineeringEdmontonABT6G 1H9Canada.
Mayank RehaniDivision of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and DentistryUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonABT6G 2R3Canada.
Ahmed W ShehataDivision of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and DentistryUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonABT6G 2R3Canada.
Jacqueline S HebertDivision of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and DentistryUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonABT6G 2R3Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Novel myoelectric control strategies may yield more robust, capable prostheses which improve quality of life for those affected by upper-limb loss; however, the development and translation of such strategies from an experimental setting towards daily use by persons with limb loss is a slow and costly process. Since prosthesis functionality is highly dependent on the physical interface between the user's prosthetic socket and residual limb, assessment of such controllers under realistic (noisy) environmental conditions, integrated into prosthetic sockets, and with participants with amputation is essential for obtaining representative results. Unfortunately, this step is particularly difficult as participant- and control strategy-specific prosthetic sockets must be custom-designed and manufactured. There is thus a need for a system to reduce these burdens and facilitate this crucial phase of the development pipeline. This study aims to address this gap through the design and assessment of an inexpensive and easy-to-use 3D-printed Modular-Adjustable transhumeral Prosthetic Socket (MAPS). This 3D-printed, open-source socket was developed in consultation with prosthetists and compared with a participant-specific suction socket in a single-participant case-study. We conducted mechanical and functional assessments to ensure that the developed socket enabled similar performance compared to participant-specific sockets. Both socket systems yielded similar results in mechanical and functional assessments, as well as in self-reported user feedback. The MAPS system shows promise as a research tool which catalyzes the development and deployment of novel myoelectric control strategies by better-enabling comprehensive assessment involving participants with amputations.

Indexed as

additive manufacturingElectromyography (EMG)linear discriminant analysispattern recognitionprosthetics

Identifiers

PMID32670675
PMCPMC7357731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.