Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32670570›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2020

Graduated compression stockings in the prevention of postoperative pulmonary embolism. A propensity-matched retrospective case-control study of 24 273 patients.

Kenan Suna, Eva Herrmann, Knut Kröger, Thomas Schmandra, Elisa Müller, Ernst Hanisch, Alexander Buia

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kenan SunaClinic for General, Visceral and Thoracic-Surgery, Asklepios Klinik Langen, Academic Teaching Hospital Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Röntgenstr 20, Langen, 63225, Germany.
Eva HerrmannInstitute of Biostatistics und Mathematical Modeling, Klinikum und Fachbereich Medizin der Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Frankfurt Am Main, 60590, Germany.
Knut KrögerClinic for Angiology, Helios Klinikum Krefeld, Lutherplatz 40, Krefeld, 47805, Germany.
Thomas SchmandraDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Heart and Vascular Clinic, Bad Neustadt, Salzburger Leite 1, Bad Neustadt a. d. Saale, 97616, Germany.
Elisa MüllerClinic for General, Visceral and Thoracic-Surgery, Asklepios Klinik Langen, Academic Teaching Hospital Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Röntgenstr 20, Langen, 63225, Germany.
Ernst HanischClinic for General, Visceral and Thoracic-Surgery, Asklepios Klinik Langen, Academic Teaching Hospital Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Röntgenstr 20, Langen, 63225, Germany.
Alexander BuiaClinic for General, Visceral and Thoracic-Surgery, Asklepios Klinik Langen, Academic Teaching Hospital Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Röntgenstr 20, Langen, 63225, Germany.
Goethe University Frankfurt · DEHelios Klinikum Krefeld · DERhön-Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRecommendations for venous thromboembolism and deep venous thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis using graduated compression stockings (GCS) is historically based and has been critically examined in current publications. Existing guidelines are inconclusive as to recommend the general use of GCS.Patients/Methods: 24 273 in-patients (general surgery and orthopedic patients) undergoing surgery between 2006 and 2016 were included in a retrospectively analysis from a single center. From January 2006 to January 2011 perioperative GCS was employed additionally to drug prophylaxis and from February 2011 to March 2016 patients received drug prophylaxis alone. According to german guidelines all patients received venous thromboembolism prophylaxis with weight-adapted LMWH. Risk stratification (low risk, moderate risk, high risk) was based on the guideline of the American College of Chest Physicians. Data analysis was performed before and after propensity matching (PM). The defined primary endpoint was the incidence of symptomatic or fatal pulmonary embolism (PE). A secondary endpoint was the incidence of deep venous thromboembolism (DVT).

resultsAfter risk stratification (low risk n = 16 483; moderate risk n = 4464; high risk n = 3326) a total of 24 273 patient were analyzed. Before to PM the relative risk for the occurrence of a PE or DVT was not increased by abstaining from GCS. After PM two groups of 11 312 patients each, one with and one without GCS application, were formed. When comparing the two groups, the relative risk (RR) for the occurrence of a pulmonary embolism was: Low Risk 0.99 [CI95% 0.998-1.000]; Moderate Risk 0.999 [CI95% 0.95-1.003]; High Risk 0.996 [CI95% 0.992-1.000] (p > 0.05). The incidence of PE in the total group LMWH alone was 0.1% (n = 16). In the total group using LMWH + GCS, the incidence was 0.3% (n = 29). RR after PM was 0.999 [CI95% 0.998-1.00].

conclusionIn comparison to prior studies with only small numbers of patients our trial shows in a large group of patients with moderate and high risk developing VTE we can support the view that abstaining from GCS-use does not increase the incidence of symptomatic or fatal PE and symptomatic DVT.

Indexed as

Compression stockingDeep vein thrombosisPulmonary embolismVenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID32670570
PMCPMC7338863
OpenAlexW3040129123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.