Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32670567›Full record

ArticleBone & joint research2020

Cosmetic stature lengthening: systematic review of outcomes and complications.

Yousef Marwan, Dan Cohen, Mohammed Alotaibi, Abdullah Addar, Mitchell Bernstein, Reggie Hamdy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone & joint research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. In the United States, cosmetic stature lengthening is ethically acceptable.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cosmetic Stature Lengthening: An Investigation Into Sociodemographic Determinants and Public Perceptions.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yousef MarwanDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, MGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Dan CohenDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, MGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Mohammed AlotaibiDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, MGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Abdullah AddarDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, MGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Mitchell BernsteinDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, MGill University Health Centre; Shriners Hospital for Children, Montreal, Canada.
Reggie HamdyDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, MGill University Health Centre; Shriners Hospital for Children, Montreal, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo systematically review the outcomes and complications of cosmetic stature lengthening.

methodsPubMed and Embase were searched on 10 November 2019 by three reviewers independently, and all relevant studies in English published up to that date were considered based on predetermined inclusion/exclusion criteria. The search was done using "cosmetic lengthening" and "stature lengthening" as key terms. The Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement was used to screen the articles.

resultsA total of 11 studies including 795 patients were included. The techniques used in the majority of the patients were classic 3- or 4-ring Ilizarov fixator (267 patients; 33.6%) and lengthening over nail (LON) (253 patients; 31.8%), while implantable lengthening nail (ILN) was used in the smallest number of patients (63 patients; 7.9%). Mean end lengthening achieved was 6.7 cm (SD 0.6; 1.5 to 13.0), and the mean follow-up duration was 4.9 years (SD 2.1; 41 days to 7 years). Overall, the mean number of problems, obstacles, and complications per patient was 0.78 (SD 0.5), 0.94 (SD 1.0), and 0.15 (SD 0.2), respectively. The most common problem and obstacle was ankle equinus deformity, while the most common complications were deformation of the regenerate after end of treatment and subtalar joint stiffness/deformity.

conclusionCosmetic stature lengthening provides favourable height gain, patient satisfaction, and functional outcomes, with low rate of major complications. Clear indications, contraindications, and guidelines for cosmetic stature lengthening are needed.Cite this article:

Indexed as

CosmeticLimb lengtheningStature lengthening

Identifiers

PMID32670567
PMCPMC7342054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.