Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32670217›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2020

Isolation and Comparative Genomic Analysis of Reuterin-Producing

Anna Greppi, Paul T Asare, Clarissa Schwab, Niklaus Zemp, Roger Stephan, Christophe Lacroix

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Preclinical Safety and Toxicological Assessment of Vitamin BMolecular nutrition & food research · 2026
    Article
  2. Biosynthetic reuterin improved the intestinal health in pigs.Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Genomic diversity and functional adaptation ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Protective Effect of Probiotics againstInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Survival Time ofThe journal of poultry science · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Frontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Assessing the effects of microencapsulatedFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anna GreppiInstitute of Food, Nutrition and Health, Laboratory of Food Biotechnology, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Paul T AsareInstitute of Food, Nutrition and Health, Laboratory of Food Biotechnology, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Clarissa SchwabInstitute of Food, Nutrition and Health, Laboratory of Food Biotechnology, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Niklaus ZempGenetic Diversity Centre, Department of Environmental Systems Sciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Roger StephanInstitute for Food Safety and Hygiene, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Christophe LacroixInstitute of Food, Nutrition and Health, Laboratory of Food Biotechnology, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
ETH Zurich · CHUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

antimicrobialchickencomparative genomicsLactobacillus reuterireuterin

Identifiers

PMID32670217
PMCPMC7326114
OpenAlexW3033814948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.