Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32670112›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2020

Spatiotemporal Differentiation of MMN From N1 Adaptation: A Human ECoG Study.

Megumi Takasago, Naoto Kunii, Misako Komatsu, Mariko Tada, Kenji Kirihara, Takanori Uka, Yohei Ishishita, Seijiro Shimada, Kiyoto Kasai, Nobuhito Saito

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Megumi TakasagoDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Naoto KuniiDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Misako KomatsuLaboratory for Molecular Analysis of Higher Brain Function, RIKEN Center for Brain Science, Wako, Japan.
Mariko TadaDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenji KiriharaDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Takanori UkaDepartment of Integrative Physiology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan.
Yohei IshishitaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Jichi Medical University, Shimotuke, Japan.
Seijiro ShimadaDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Kiyoto KasaiDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Nobuhito SaitoDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Auditory mismatch negativity (MMN) is an electrophysiological response to a deviation from regularity. This response is considered pivotal to understanding auditory processing, particularly in the pre-attentive phase. However, previous findings suggest that MMN is a product of N1 adaptation/enhancement, which reflects lower-order auditory processing. The separability of these two components remains unclear and is considered an important issue in the field of neuroscience. The aim of the present study was to spatiotemporally differentiate MMN from N1 adaptation using human electrocorticography (ECoG). Auditory evoked potentials under the classical oddball (OD) task as well as the many standards (MS) task were recorded in three patients with epilepsy whose lateral cortices were widely covered with high-density electrodes. Close observation identified an electrode at which N1 adaptation was temporally separated from MMN, whereas N1 adaptation was partially incorporated into MMN at other electrodes. Since N1 adaptation occurs in the N1 population, we spatially compared MMN with N1 obtained from the MS task instead of N1 adaptation. As a result, N1 was observed in a limited area around the Sylvian fissure adjacent to A1, whereas MMN was noted in wider areas, including the temporal, frontal, and parietal lobes. MMN was thus considered to be differentiated from N1 adaptation. The results suggest that MMN is not merely a product of the neural adaptation of N1 and instead represents higher-order processes in auditory deviance detection. These results will contribute to strengthening the foundation of future research in this field.

Indexed as

adaptationauditory mismatch negativity (auditory MMN)deviance detectionelectrocorticography (ECoG)event-related potential (ERP)N1

Identifiers

PMID32670112
PMCPMC7333077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.