Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32670076›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in physiology2020

Menstrual Cycle Effects on Exercise-Induced Fatigability.

Hugo M Pereira, Rebecca D Larson, Debra A Bemben

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06006507 (The Effect of Exercise on Menstrual Symptoms), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06006507 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Exercise on Menstrual Symptoms: a Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUskudar UniversityRan2023 to 2023Enrolled54ConditionsMenstrual ProblemArmscontrol, exercise
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Sync or Swim: Navigating the Tides of Menstrual Cycle Messaging on TikTok.Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hugo M PereiraDepartment of Health and Exercise Science, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, United States.
Rebecca D LarsonDepartment of Health and Exercise Science, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, United States.
Debra A BembenDepartment of Health and Exercise Science, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Estrogen and progesterone have distinct concentrations across the menstrual cycle, each one promoting several physiological alterations other than preparing the uterus for pregnancy. Whether these physiological alterations can influence motor output during a fatiguing contraction is the goal of this review, with an emphasis on the obtained effect sizes. Studies on this topic frequently attempt to report if there is a statistically significant difference in fatigability between the follicular and luteal phases of the menstrual cycle. Although the significant difference (the

Indexed as

endurancefatiguemenstrual cycleprogesterone and estradiolstrengthtime to task failure

Identifiers

PMID32670076
PMCPMC7332750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.