ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2020
Identification of Hub Genes in Protective Effect of Astragaloside IV on Aconitine-Induced Cardiac Damage in Zebrafish Based on Bioinformatics Analysis.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Astragaloside IV ameliorates peritoneal fibrosis by promoting PGC-1α to reduce apoptosis in vitro and in vivo.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2023Article
- Untapping the Potential of Astragaloside IV in the Battle Against Respiratory Diseases.Drug design, development and therapy · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accumulating evidence suggests that Astragaloside IV (AS-IV) improves cardiac function and protects the cardiovascular system. However, the molecular targets involved remain ambiguous. In this work, we report research suggesting that AS-IV can antagonize arrhythmias and reduce the cardiac damage induced by aconitine in zebrafish. Zebrafish have certain benefits with respect to studying the effect of drugs on cardiovascular disease. The possible mechanisms involved are analyzed, and hub gene targets are predicted. First, a model of cardiac damage induced by aconitine was created, and then a safe drug concentration of AS-IV was screened, and the appropriate drug dose gradient was selected within a safe drug concentration range. Second, we confirmed the protective effect of AS-IV in the cardiovascular system by observing changes in zebrafish heart rates and the cardiac and vascular structure. Third, we aimed to demonstrate the antagonistic mechanism of AS-IV on heart rate and cardiac damage induced by aconitine in zebrafish, with differentially expressed genes (DEGs) detected by RNA sequencing. The DEGs were then further analyzed by bioinformatic techniques, such as function enrichment analysis, protein-protein interaction network, and DNA-microRNA networks, for example. Next, we predicted the hub genes of the cardiac protective effects of AS-IV. Finally, we validated these genes in different transcriptome sequence datasets of cardiac damage. Thus, we conclude that miR-26b-5p/ATF3/JUN are key targets of AS-IV and play an important role in maintaining cardiac homeostasis and regulating cardiac remodeling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.