Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32670012›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2020

Supervised Learning in All FeFET-Based Spiking Neural Network: Opportunities and Challenges.

Sourav Dutta, Clemens Schafer, Jorge Gomez, Kai Ni, Siddharth Joshi, Suman Datta

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. All-Ferroelectric Spiking Neural Networks via Morphotropic Phase Boundary Neurons.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sourav DuttaDepartment of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, United States.
Clemens SchaferDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, United States.
Jorge GomezDepartment of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, United States.
Kai NiDepartment of Microsystems Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, United States.
Siddharth JoshiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, United States.
Suman DattaDepartment of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, United States.
University of Notre Dame · USRochester Institute of Technology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The two possible pathways toward artificial intelligence (AI)-(i) neuroscience-oriented neuromorphic computing [like spiking neural network (SNN)] and (ii) computer science driven machine learning (like deep learning) differ widely in their fundamental formalism and coding schemes (Pei et al., 2019). Deviating from traditional deep learning approach of relying on neuronal models with static nonlinearities, SNNs attempt to capture brain-like features like computation using spikes. This holds the promise of improving the energy efficiency of the computing platforms. In order to achieve a much higher areal and energy efficiency compared to today's hardware implementation of SNN, we need to go beyond the traditional route of relying on CMOS-based digital or mixed-signal neuronal circuits and segregation of computation and memory under the von Neumann architecture. Recently, ferroelectric field-effect transistors (FeFETs) are being explored as a promising alternative for building neuromorphic hardware by utilizing their non-volatile nature and rich polarization switching dynamics. In this work, we propose an all FeFET-based SNN hardware that allows low-power spike-based information processing and co-localized memory and computing (a.k.a. in-memory computing). We experimentally demonstrate the essential neuronal and synaptic dynamics in a 28 nm high-K metal gate FeFET technology. Furthermore, drawing inspiration from the traditional machine learning approach of optimizing a cost function to adjust the synaptic weights, we implement a surrogate gradient (SG) learning algorithm on our SNN platform that allows us to perform supervised learning on MNIST dataset. As such, we provide a pathway toward building energy-efficient neuromorphic hardware that can support traditional machine learning algorithms. Finally, we undertake synergistic device-algorithm co-design by accounting for the impacts of device-level variation (stochasticity) and limited bit precision of on-chip synaptic weights (available analog states) on the classification accuracy.

Indexed as

analog synapseferroelectric FETneuromorphic computingspiking neural networkspiking neuronsupervised learningsurrogate gradient learning

Identifiers

PMID32670012
PMCPMC7327100
OpenAlexW3038044676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.