Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32669756›Full record

ArticleEarly childhood research quarterly

Observing individual children in early childhood classrooms using Optimizing Learning Opportunities for Students (OLOS): A feasibility study.

Carol McDonald Connor, Ashley Adams, Elham Zargar, Taffeta S Wood, Belinda E Hernandez, Deborah Lowe Vandell

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Early childhood research quarterly. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carol McDonald ConnorUniversity of California, Irvine.
Ashley AdamsUniversity of California, Irvine.
Elham ZargarUniversity of California, Irvine.
Taffeta S WoodUniversity of California, Irvine.
Belinda E HernandezUniversity of California, Irvine.
Deborah Lowe VandellUniversity of California, Irvine.
University of California, Irvine · US

Funding

THE FLORIDA LONGITUDINAL STUDYP50HD052120 · NICHD · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Nicole Sandi Patton-Terry · 2006 to 2026
$31.7M
Child-Instruction Interactions Causal Effects on ReadingR01HD048539 · NICHD · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CONNOR, CAROL MCDONALD · 2005 to 2010
$2.4M
Developing Dynamic Forecasting Intervention Models for Upper Elementary StudentsR21HD062834 · NICHD · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CONNOR, CAROL MCDONALD · 2010 to 2011
$356k
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD052120NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD048539NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD062834
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we present a newly developed observational system, Optimizing Learning Opportunities for Students (OLOS). OLOS is designed to elucidate the learning opportunities afforded to individual children within early childhood classrooms and as they transition to formal schooling (kindergarten through third grade). OLOS records the time spent in different types of learning opportunities (e.g., play, literacy, math) and the frequency of specific discourse moves children and teachers use (child talk and teacher talk). Importantly, it is being designed to be used validly and reliably by practitioners. Using OLOS, we explored individual children's experiences (n = 68 children in 12 classrooms) in four different types of early childhood programs; state-funded, state-funded PK serving children with disabilities, Head Start, and a tuition-based (non-profit) preschool. Results of our feasibility study revealed that we could feasibly and reliably use OLOS in these very different kinds of pre-kindergarten programs with some changes. OLOS provided data that aligned with our hypotheses and that our practitioner partners found useful. In analysing the observations, we found that individual children's learning opportunities varied significantly both within and between classrooms. In general, we observed that most of the PK day (or half day) was spent in language and literacy activities and non-instructional activities (e.g., transitions). Very little time in math and science was observed yet children were generally more likely to actively participate (i.e., more child talk) during academic learning opportunities (literacy, math, and science). The frequency of teacher talk also varied widely between classrooms and across programs. Plus, the more teacher talk we observed, the more likely we were to observe child talk. Our long-term aim is that OLOS can inform policy and provide information that supports practitioners in meeting the learning and social-behavioral needs of the children they serve.

Indexed as

Classroom Environmentclassroom observationearly childhood educationEarly InterventionLearning opportunitiesLiteracyMathematicsPolicypreschoolPreschool

Identifiers

PMID32669756
PMCPMC7363025
OpenAlexW2997840716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.