ArticleScientific reports2020
The application of deep learning based diagnostic system to cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions recognition in colposcopy images.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
57 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using deep learning to predict survival outcome in non-surgical cervical cancer patients based on pathological images.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Trial
- Cervical lesion assessment using real-time microendoscopy image analysis in Brazil: The CLARA study.International journal of cancer · 2021Trial
- From HPV infection to cervical precancer: Molecular mechanisms, immune microenvironment and emerging technologies.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2026Review
- MMTC-Net: Multimodal Temporal Cervical Network for HSIL+ Recognition in Precancer Screening.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Time-lapsed colposcopy image-based segmentation of cervical lesion areas.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- AI-assisted diagnosis of cervical dysplasia from cervicography images.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- AID-FGS: Artificial intelligence-enabled diagnosis of female genital schistosomiasis: Preliminary findings.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Advances in Cervical Cancer Diagnostics Based on Immunosensors: Innovative Approaches and Tumor Biomarkers.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2026Review
- Concordance of AI-Assisted and Hybrid AI-Assisted Cervical Imaging Systems with Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid for Cervical Precancer Screening in West Bandung, Indonesia.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Semi-supervised learning for colposcopic image classification using generative adversarial networks.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Machine learning in early screening for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia using blood testing.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Integrating Biomarkers into Cervical Cancer Screening-Advances in Diagnosis and Risk Prediction: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Automated detection and classification of cervical and anal squamous cancer precursors using deep learning and multidevice colposcopy.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Machine and Deep Learning for the Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Treatment of Cervical Cancer: A Scoping Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Integrating SEResNet101 and SE-VGG19 for advanced cervical lesion detection: a step forward in precision oncology.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- The Role of Ion Channels in Cervical Cancer Progression: From Molecular Biomarkers to Diagnostic and Therapeutic Innovations.Cancers · 2025Review
- AI-Based Identification Method for Cervical Transformation Zone Within Digital Colposcopy: Development and Multicenter Validation Study.JMIR cancer · 2025Article
- Integrating artificial intelligence with smartphone-based imaging for cancer detection in vivo.Biosensors & bioelectronics · 2025Review
- A novel lightweight multi-scale feature fusion segmentation algorithm for real-time cervical lesion screening.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Performance of artificial intelligence for diagnosing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Deep learning has presented considerable potential and is gaining more importance in computer assisted diagnosis. As the gold standard for pathologically diagnosing cervical intraepithelial lesions and invasive cervical cancer, colposcopy-guided biopsy faces challenges in improving accuracy and efficiency worldwide, especially in developing countries. To ease the heavy burden of cervical cancer screening, it is urgent to establish a scientific, accurate and efficient method for assisting diagnosis and biopsy. Methods The data were collected to establish three deep-learning-based models. For every case, one saline image, one acetic image, one iodine image and the corresponding clinical information, including age, the results of human papillomavirus testing and cytology, type of transformation zone, and pathologic diagnosis, were collected. The dataset was proportionally divided into three subsets including the training set, the test set and the validation set, at a ratio of 8:1:1. The validation set was used to evaluate model performance. After model establishment, an independent dataset of high-definition images was collected to further evaluate the model performance. In addition, the comparison of diagnostic accuracy between colposcopists and models weas performed. Results The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the classification model to differentiate negative cases from positive cases were 85.38%, 82.62% and 84.10% respectively, with an AUC of 0.93. The recall and DICE of the segmentation model to segment suspicious lesions in acetic images were 84.73% and 61.64%, with an average accuracy of 95.59%. Furthermore, 84.67% of high-grade lesions were detected by the acetic detection model. Compared to colposcopists, the diagnostic system performed better in ordinary colposcopy images but slightly unsatisfactory in high-definition images. Implications The deep learning-based diagnostic system could help assist colposcopy diagnosis and biopsy for HSILs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.