ArticleCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)2020
Primary Care Provider Beliefs and Recommendations About Colorectal Cancer Screening in Four Healthcare Systems.
Article in Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cancer Screening as a Conversation, Not a Checklist: Enhancing Professional Cancer Education Through Narrative Medicine.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026Article
- Adherence to Obstetrician-/Gynecologist-Ordered Multi-target Stool DNA Test Screening and Follow-Up Colonoscopy: A National Multi-payer Study of US Women.Advances in therapy · 2026Article
- Navigating the evolving landscape of colorectal cancer screening with a practical framework: a comprehensive analysis of existing and emerging technologies for informed decision-making.Oncology reviews · 2025Review
- Patterns of Care Following a Positive Fecal Blood Test for Colorectal Cancer: A Mixed Methods Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2024Article
- Provider beliefs in effectiveness and recommendations for primary HPV testing in 3 health-care systems.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2023Article
- Spatial distribution of mortality from colorectal cancer in the southern region of Brazil.PloS one · 2023Article
- Colorectal cancer screening preferences among physicians and individuals at average risk: A discrete choice experiment.Cancer medicine · 2022Article
- Perceived effectiveness of cancer screening among family medicine and internal medicine physicians in the United States.Preventive medicine reports · 2022Article
- Factors Associated With Clinician Recommendations for Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Average-Risk Patients: Data From a National Survey.Preventing chronic disease · 2022Article
- Differences in Breast and Colorectal Cancer Screening Adherence Among Women Residing in Urban and Rural Communities in the United States.JAMA network open · 2021Article
- Having a Routine Source of Healthcare and Its Impact on Colorectal Cancer Screening Recommendation Compliance.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Primary care provider's (PCP) perceptions of colorectal cancer screening test effectiveness and their recommendations for testing intervals influence patient screening uptake. Few large studies have examined providers' perceptions and recommendations, including their alignment with evidence suggesting comparable test effectiveness and guideline recommendations for screening frequency. Providers (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.