Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32669212›Full record

ArticleClinical genitourinary cancer2021

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiomics Analyses for Prediction of High-Grade Histology and Necrosis in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Preliminary Experience.

Durgesh K Dwivedi, Yin Xi, Payal Kapur, Ananth J Madhuranthakam, Matthew A Lewis, Durga Udayakumar, Robert Rasmussen, Qing Yuan, Aditya Bagrodia, Vitaly Margulis and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical genitourinary cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The 2021 COVID-19 Artificial Intelligence Issue.Clinical genitourinary cancer · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Durgesh K DwivediDepartment of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Yin XiDepartment of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Clinical Science, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Payal KapurDepartment of Pathology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Kidney Cancer Program, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Ananth J MadhuranthakamDepartment of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Kidney Cancer Program, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Advanced Imaging Research Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Matthew A LewisDepartment of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Durga UdayakumarDepartment of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Kidney Cancer Program, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Advanced Imaging Research Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Robert RasmussenDepartment of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Qing YuanDepartment of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Aditya BagrodiaDepartment of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Kidney Cancer Program, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Vitaly MargulisDepartment of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Kidney Cancer Program, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Michael FulkersonDepartment of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
James BrugarolasKidney Cancer Program, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Jeffrey A CadedduDepartment of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Kidney Cancer Program, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Ivan PedrosaDepartment of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Kidney Cancer Program, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Advanced Imaging Research Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX. Electronic address: Ivan.Pedrosa@utsouthwestern.edu.
Southwestern Medical CenterSouthwestern Medical Center · USAdvanced Imaging Research (United States) · US

Funding

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center SPORE in Kidney CancerP50CA196516 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI James Brugarolas · 2016 to 2026
$24.7M
NON-INVASIVE PHYSIOLOGIC PREDICTORS OF AGGRESSIVENESS IN RENAL CELL CARCINOMAR01CA154475 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI PEDROSA, IVAN · 2011 to 2024
$4.3M
Quantitative Non-Contrast Perfusion using Arterial Spin Labeling for Assessment of Cancer Therapy ResponseU01CA207091 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI MADHURANTHAKAM, ANANTH J, MALDJIAN, JOSEPH A · 2017 to 2022
$3.1M
Training Clinician Scientists as Outstanding Clinicians and Imaging ScientistsT32EB028093 · NIBIB · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI ROBERT F MATTREY, Takeshi Yokoo · 2019 to 2026
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA196516NCI NIH HHS R01 CA154475NCI NIH HHS U01 CA207091NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB028093
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPercutaneous renal mass biopsy results can accurately diagnose clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC); however, their reliability to determine nuclear grade in larger, heterogeneous tumors is limited. We assessed the ability of radiomics analyses of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to predict high-grade (HG) histology in ccRCC. PATIENTS AND

methodsSeventy patients with a renal mass underwent 3 T MRI before surgery between August 2012 and August 2017. Tumor length, first-order statistics, and Haralick texture features were calculated on T2-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI after manual tumor segmentation. After a variable clustering algorithm was applied, tumor length, washout, and all cluster features were evaluated univariably by receiver operating characteristic curves. Three logistic regression models were constructed to assess the predictability of HG ccRCC and then cross-validated.

resultsAt univariate analysis, area under the curve values of length, and DCE texture cluster 1 and cluster 3 for diagnosis of HG ccRCC were 0.7 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58-0.82, false discovery rate P = .008), 0.72 (95% CI, 0.59-0.84, false discovery rate P = .004), and 0.75 (95% CI, 0.63-0.87, false discovery rate P = .0009), respectively. At multivariable analysis, area under the curve for model 1 (tumor length only), model 2 (length + DCE clusters 3 and 4), and model 3 (DCE cluster 1 and 3) for diagnosis of HG ccRCC were 0.67 (95% CI, 0.54-0.79), 0.82 (95% CI, 0.71-0.92), and 0.81 (95% CI, 0.70-0.91), respectively.

conclusionRadiomics analysis of MRI images was superior to tumor size for the prediction of HG histology in ccRCC in our cohort.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNecrosisReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesFirst-order statisticsGray level co-occurrence matrixKidney cancerTexture analysisTumor heterogeneity

Identifiers

PMID32669212
PMCPMC7680717
OpenAlexW3026081260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.