Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32669104›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2020

A need-based, multi-level, cross-sectoral framework to explain variations in satisfaction of care needs among people living with dementia.

Chiara De Poli, Jan Oyebode, Mara Airoldi, Richard Glover

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chiara De PoliDepartment of Social Policy and Department of Management, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2A, UK. c.de-poli@lse.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1879-553X
Jan OyebodeCentre for Applied Dementia Studies, Faculty of Health Studies, Richmond Road, Bradford, BD7 1DP, UK.
Mara AiroldiBlavatnik School of Government, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, 120 Walton St, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.
Richard GloverNHS North of England Commissioning Support, John Snow House, Durham, DH1 3YG, UK.
London School of Economics and Political Science · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Health Foundation 1274233
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProvision of care and support for people with dementia and family carers is complex, given variation in how dementia manifests, progresses and affects people, co-morbidities associated with ageing, as well as individual preferences, needs, and circumstances. The traditional service-led approach, where individual needs are assessed against current service provision, has been recognised as unfit to meet such complexity. As a result, people with dementia and family members often fail to receive adequate support, with needs remaining unmet. Current research lacks a conceptual framework for explaining variation in satisfaction of care needs. This work develops a conceptual framework mapped onto the care delivery process to explain variations in whether, when and why care needs of people with dementia are met and to expose individual-, service-, system-level factors that enable or hinder needs satisfaction.

methodsData collected through 24 in-depth interviews and two focus groups (10 participants) with people with dementia and family carers living in the North East of England (UK) were analysed thematically to develop a typology of care needs. The need most frequently reported for people with dementia (i.e. for support to go out and about) was analysed using themes stemming from the conceptual framework which combined candidacy and discrepancy theories.

resultsThe operationalisation of the framework showed that satisfaction of the need to go out was first determined at the point of service access, affected by issues about navigation, adjudication, permeability, users' resistance to offers, users' appearance, and systems-level operating conditions, and, subsequently, at the point of service use, when factors related to service structure and care process determined (dis)satisfaction with service and, hence, further contributed to met or unmet need.

conclusionThe conceptual framework pinpoints causes of variations in satisfaction of care needs which can be addressed when designing interventions and service improvements.

Indexed as

CaregiversDementiaHealth Services Needs and DemandPatient SatisfactionAgedAged, 80 and overEnglandFamilyFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedSocial Work

Identifiers

PMID32669104
PMCPMC7364635
OpenAlexW3043405427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.