ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2020
A Comparative Study of Laparoscopic versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Ampulla of Vater Carcinoma.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Therapeutic strategies and outcomes in the management of ampullary tumours: meta-analysis.BJS open · 2026Pooled it
- The clinical implication of minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for non-pancreatic periampullary cancer: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Surgical methods influence on the risk of anastomotic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Pooled it
- Laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic and periampullary tumor: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and non-randomized comparative studies.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Laparoscopic vs. Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy After Learning Curve: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Single-Center Studies.Frontiers in surgery · 2021Pooled it
- Indirect comparison of perioperative outcomes between open, laparoscopic, and robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: Systematic review and network meta-analysis.Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2026Article
- Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and totally laparoscopic PD after overcoming learning curves with comparison of oncologic outcomes between open PD and minimally invasive PD.Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2024Article
- Morbidity and survival after laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy: propensity score matched comparison.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2023Article
- The long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for ampullary carcinoma showed similar survival: a case-matched comparative study.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A review of recent paradigms and advances in epidemiology, clinical diagnosis and management.World journal of gastroenterology · 2021Review
- Article
- Nomogram based on albumin and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for predicting postoperative complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy.Gland surgery · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several studies have compared laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) and open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) in patients with periampullary carcinoma; however, only a few studies have made such a comparison on patients with ampulla of Vater cancer (AVC). We compared the perioperative and oncologic outcomes between LPD and OPD in patients with AVC using propensity-score-matched analysis. A total of 359 patients underwent PD due to AVC during the study period (76 LPD, 283 OPD). After propensity score matching, the LPD group showed significantly longer operation time than did the OPD group (400.2 vs. 344.6 min,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.