Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32668602›Full record

ReviewCells2020

Tulasi Yadati, Tom Houben, Albert Bitorina, Ronit Shiri-Sverdlov

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 282 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
282citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
23.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

282 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 492 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Exercise-induced lysosomal adaptations in skeletal muscle.Sports medicine and health science · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

222 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tulasi YadatiSchool of Nutrition & Translational Research Maastricht (NUTRIM), Department of Molecular Genetics, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Tom HoubenSchool of Nutrition & Translational Research Maastricht (NUTRIM), Department of Molecular Genetics, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Albert BitorinaSchool of Nutrition & Translational Research Maastricht (NUTRIM), Department of Molecular Genetics, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Ronit Shiri-SverdlovSchool of Nutrition & Translational Research Maastricht (NUTRIM), Department of Molecular Genetics, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cathepsins are the most abundant lysosomal proteases that are mainly found in acidic endo/lysosomal compartments where they play a vital role in intracellular protein degradation, energy metabolism, and immune responses among a host of other functions. The discovery that cathepsins are secreted and remain functionally active outside of the lysosome has caused a paradigm shift. Contemporary research has unraveled many versatile functions of cathepsins in extralysosomal locations including cytosol and extracellular space. Nevertheless, extracellular cathepsins are majorly upregulated in pathological states and are implicated in a wide range of diseases including cancer and cardiovascular diseases. Taking advantage of the differential expression of the cathepsins during pathological conditions, much research is focused on using cathepsins as diagnostic markers and therapeutic targets. A tailored therapeutic approach using selective cathepsin inhibitors is constantly emerging to be safe and efficient. Moreover, recent development of proteomic-based approaches for the identification of novel physiological substrates offers a major opportunity to understand the mechanism of cathepsin action. In this review, we summarize the available evidence regarding the role of cathepsins in health and disease, discuss their potential as biomarkers of disease progression, and shed light on the potential of extracellular cathepsin inhibitors as safe therapeutic tools.

Indexed as

DiseaseAnimalsCathepsinsCytosolEndosomesExtracellular SpaceHumansLysosomesCathepsinscathepsinsLysosomessite-specific functionstargeted-drug deliverytranslocation

Identifiers

PMID32668602
PMCPMC7407943
OpenAlexW3041901315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.