Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32668575›Full record

ReviewMicroorganisms2020

Current Evidence on the Ocular Surface Microbiota and Related Diseases.

Francesco Petrillo, Danilo Pignataro, Maria Annunziata Lavano, Biagio Santella, Veronica Folliero, Carla Zannella, Carlo Astarita, Caterina Gagliano, Gianluigi Franci, Teresio Avitabile and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microorganisms, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed
13.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed, 164 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Update on the Physiopathology of Keratoconus.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Phenotypic characterization, molecular typing, and clonal relatedness within Staphylococcus isolates in healthy ocular conditions.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Francesco PetrilloSection of Ophthalmology, University Hospital "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele", 95123 Catania, Italy.
Danilo PignataroSection of Microbiology and Virology, University Hospital "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2745-8703
Maria Annunziata LavanoSection of Microbiology and Virology, University Hospital "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9776-0406
Biagio SantellaSection of Microbiology and Virology, University Hospital "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5010-1390
Veronica FollieroDepartment of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.
Carla ZannellaDepartment of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.
Carlo AstaritaSbarro Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Department of Biology, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA.
Caterina GaglianoSection of Ocular Immunology and Rare Diseases, University Hospital "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele", 95123 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8424-0068
Gianluigi FranciDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana", University of Salerno, 84081 Baronissi (S.A.), Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3321-4331
Teresio AvitabileSection of Ophthalmology, University Hospital "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele", 95123 Catania, Italy.
Marilena GaldieroDepartment of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico - Vittorio Emanuele · ITTemple University · USUniversity of Salerno · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ocular surface microbiota refers to the resident non-pathogenic microorganisms that colonize conjunctiva and cornea. Several studies have shown that ocular surface epithelial cells can respond selectively to specific components of ocular pathogenic bacteria by producing pro-inflammatory cytokines and, in contrast, they do not respond to non-pathogenic bacteria, thus supporting the colonization by a real microbiota. However, the analysis of the ocular microbiome composition is essential for understanding the pathophysiology of various ophthalmic diseases. In this scenario, the first studies, which used microbiological culture techniques, reported a less diverse profile of the ocular microbiota compared with that recently discovered using new molecular-based methods. Indeed, until a few years ago, the microbiota of the ocular surface appeared to be dominated by Gram-positive and a few Gram-negative bacteria, as well as some fungal strains. In contrast, genomics has nowadays detected a remarkable diversity in the ocular surface microorganisms. Furthermore, recent studies suggest that the microbiota of other areas of the body, such as the gut and oral microbiota, are involved in the pathophysiology of several ophthalmic diseases. The aim of the present study is to highlight the current evidence on the ocular surface microbiota to better understand it and to investigate its potential role in the development of ophthalmic diseases.

Indexed as

microbiotaocular surfaceophthalmic diseases

Identifiers

PMID32668575
PMCPMC7409318
OpenAlexW3041802106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.