Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32668455›Full record

Trial reportClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2021

Switching to Bictegravir, Emtricitabine, and Tenofovir Alafenamide in Virologically Suppressed Adults With Human Immunodeficiency Virus.

Paul E Sax, Jürgen K Rockstroh, Anne F Luetkemeyer, Yazdan Yazdanpanah, Douglas Ward, Benoit Trottier, Armin Rieger, Hui Liu, Rima Acosta, Sean E Collins and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03110380 (A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Switching From a Regimen of Dolutegravir and Either Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide or Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate to a Fixed Dose Combination of Bictegravir/ Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide in HIV-1 Infected Subjects Who Are Virologically Suppressed), which is not on this map. Cited by 53 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03110380 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Switching From a Regimen of Dolutegravir and Either Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide or Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate to a Fixed Dose Combination of Bictegravir/ Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide in HIV-1 Infected Subjects Who Are Virologically Suppressed

TypeinterventionalSponsorGilead SciencesRan2017 to 2021Enrolled567ConditionsHIV-1-infectionArmsB/F/TAF, F/TAF, DTG, DTG Placebo, F/TAF Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Paul E SaxBrigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Jürgen K RockstrohUniversity Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Anne F LuetkemeyerUniversity of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Yazdan YazdanpanahHôpital Bichat Claude Bernard, Paris, France.
Douglas WardDupont Circle Physicians, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Benoit TrottierClinique de Medecine Urbaine du Quartier Latin, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Armin RiegerUniversity of Vienna Medical School, Vienna, Austria.
Hui LiuGilead Sciences, Foster City, California, USA.
Rima AcostaGilead Sciences, Foster City, California, USA.
Sean E CollinsGilead Sciences, Foster City, California, USA.
Diana M BrainardGilead Sciences, Foster City, California, USA.
Hal MartinGilead Sciences, Foster City, California, USA.
GS-US-380–4030 Investigators
Gilead Sciences (United States) · USHarvard University · USHôpital Bichat-Claude-Bernard · FRMedical University of Vienna · ATUniversity Hospital Bonn · DEUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBictegravir (B)/emtricitabine (F)/tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) is guideline-recommended treatment for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). We evaluated whether people receiving dolutegravir (DTG) plus F/TAF or F/TDF (tenofovir disoproxil fumarate) with viral suppression can switch to B/F/TAF without compromising safety or efficacy, regardless of preexisting nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) resistance.

methodsIn this multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, active-controlled, noninferiority trial, we enrolled adults who were virologically suppressed for ≥6 months before screening (with documented/suspected NRTI resistance) or ≥3 months before screening (with no documented/suspected NRTI resistance) on DTG plus either F/TDF or F/TAF. We randomly assigned (1:1) participants to switch to B/F/TAF or DTG + F/TAF once daily for 48 weeks, each with matching placebo. The primary endpoint was proportion of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL at week 48 (snapshot algorithm); the prespecified noninferiority margin was 4%.

resultsFive hundred sixty-seven adults were randomized; 565 were treated (284 B/F/TAF, 281 DTG + F/TAF). At week 48, B/F/TAF was noninferior to DTG + F/TAF, as 0.4% (1/284) vs 1.1% (3/281) had HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL (difference, -0.7% [95.001% confidence interval {CI}, -2.8% to 1.0%]). There were no significant differences in efficacy among participants with suspected or confirmed prior NRTI resistance (n = 138). No participant had treatment-emergent drug resistance. Median weight change from baseline at week 48 was +1.3 kg (B/F/TAF) vs +1.1 kg (DTG + F/TAF) (P = .46). Weight change differed by baseline NRTIs (+2.2 kg [F/TDF] and +0.6 kg [F/TAF], P < .001), with no differences between B/F/TAF and DTG + F/TAF.

conclusionsThe single-tablet regimen B/F/TAF is a safe, effective option for people virologically suppressed on DTG plus either F/TDF or F/TAF, including in individuals with preexisting resistance to NRTIs. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT03110380.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsHIV-1HIV InfectionsAdultAlanineAmidesEmtricitabineHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingHumansPiperazinesPyridonesTenofovirAlanineAmidesAnti-HIV AgentsbictegravirEmtricitabineHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingPiperazinesPyridonesTenofovirtenofovir alafenamidebictegravirdolutegravirHIVINSTItenofovir alafenamide

Identifiers

PMID32668455
PMCPMC8282313
OpenAlexW3042726352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.