ArticleJournal of surgical oncology2020
Triple-negative apocrine carcinoma: A rare pathologic subtype with a better prognosis than other triple-negative breast cancers.
Article in Journal of surgical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- The clinical relevance of apocrine morphology in breast cancer depends on the estrogen receptor status.NPJ breast cancer · 2026Article
- The development of Breast Apocrine Carcinoma (BAC) score that distinguishes breast and cutaneous apocrine carcinomas.Research square · 2026Article
- Proteomics characterization of triple-negative apocrine carcinoma reveals molecular features of progression and chemotherapy response.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Triple-Negative Apocrine Carcinoma: Largest Cohort Highlights Unique Biology and Survival Advantage.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Rare Breast Cancers Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Breast Cancer Subtypes: Clinicopathologic Features and Treatment Considerations.Current breast cancer reports · 2024Article
- Rare subtypes of triple negative breast cancer: Current understanding and future directions.NPJ breast cancer · 2023Review
- HER2-positive apocrine carcinoma of the breast: a population-based analysis of treatment and outcome.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2022Article
- Triple-Negative Apocrine Breast Carcinoma Has Better Prognosis despite Poor Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Triple-negative apocrine carcinoma as a rare cause of a breast lump in a Syrian female: a case report and review of the literature.BMC women's health · 2021Review
- Rare Breast Cancer Subtypes.Current oncology reports · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
methodsApocrine adenocarcinoma is a rare subtype of breast cancer. We sought to compare the characteristics and survival of patients diagnosed with triple-negative apocrine adenocarcinoma to those of patients diagnosed with triple-negative invasive ductal carcinoma. Utilizing data from the National Cancer Database between 2004 and 2013, 70 524 eligible female patients with triple-negative breast cancer were identified including 566 patients with apocrine adenocarcinomas and 69 958 patients with invasive ductal carcinoma. Descriptive statistics for each variable were reported. A comparison of each covariate between the study cohorts was assessed in univariate and multivariate analysis. Cox proportional models were used to calculate hazard ratios. Additionally, the propensity score matching method was implemented to reduce treatment selection bias.
resultsPatients with triple-negative apocrine tumors were more likely to be older, Caucasian, and have smaller, moderately to well-differentiated tumors. Multivariable analysis noted a significantly improved survival for patients with triple-negative apocrine carcinoma (TNAC) vs triple-negative invasive ductal carcinoma (TNBC) (hazard ratio [HR] 0.65 [95% confidence interval [CI] [0.53-0.81], P = 0 < .001). Propensity score matching analysis confirmed a significant difference in overall survival for patients with TNAC in comparison to TNBC (HR 0.79 [95% CI [0.63-1.00], P = .05). DISCUSSION: Triple-negative apocrine adenocarcinomas have a modestly improved long-term survival when compared with triple-negative invasive ductal cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.