Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32668059›Full record

ArticleJournal of surgical oncology2020

Triple-negative apocrine carcinoma: A rare pathologic subtype with a better prognosis than other triple-negative breast cancers.

Cletus A Arciero, Albert H Diehl, Yuan Liu, Qin Sun, Theresa Gillespie, Xiaoxian Li, Preeti Subhedar

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of surgical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Rare Breast Cancers Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Rare Breast Cancer Subtypes.Current oncology reports · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cletus A ArcieroDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8673-3349
Albert H DiehlPeidmont Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia.
Yuan LiuDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Qin SunDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Theresa GillespieDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Xiaoxian LiGlenn Family Breast Center, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia.
Preeti SubhedarDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4527-0402
Emory University · USPiedmont Atlanta Hospital · US

Funding

Winship Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support GrantP30CA138292 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Suresh S Ramalingam · 2009 to 2026
$47.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA138292NCI NIH HHS P30CA138292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

methodsApocrine adenocarcinoma is a rare subtype of breast cancer. We sought to compare the characteristics and survival of patients diagnosed with triple-negative apocrine adenocarcinoma to those of patients diagnosed with triple-negative invasive ductal carcinoma. Utilizing data from the National Cancer Database between 2004 and 2013, 70 524 eligible female patients with triple-negative breast cancer were identified including 566 patients with apocrine adenocarcinomas and 69 958 patients with invasive ductal carcinoma. Descriptive statistics for each variable were reported. A comparison of each covariate between the study cohorts was assessed in univariate and multivariate analysis. Cox proportional models were used to calculate hazard ratios. Additionally, the propensity score matching method was implemented to reduce treatment selection bias.

resultsPatients with triple-negative apocrine tumors were more likely to be older, Caucasian, and have smaller, moderately to well-differentiated tumors. Multivariable analysis noted a significantly improved survival for patients with triple-negative apocrine carcinoma (TNAC) vs triple-negative invasive ductal carcinoma (TNBC) (hazard ratio [HR] 0.65 [95% confidence interval [CI] [0.53-0.81], P = 0 < .001). Propensity score matching analysis confirmed a significant difference in overall survival for patients with TNAC in comparison to TNBC (HR 0.79 [95% CI [0.63-1.00], P = .05). DISCUSSION: Triple-negative apocrine adenocarcinomas have a modestly improved long-term survival when compared with triple-negative invasive ductal cancers.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overApocrine GlandsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCohort StudiesCombined Modality TherapyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingSEER ProgramSurvival RateTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsYoung Adultapocrine carcinomasurvivaltriple-negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID32668059
PMCPMC10637266
OpenAlexW3042759600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.