Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32668023›Full record

SynthesisHeadache2020

Efficacy and Contextual (Placebo) Effects of CGRP Antibodies for Migraine: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Raeburn B Forbes, Mark McCarron, Chris R Cardwell

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Headache, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficacy and safety of CGRP monoclonal antibodies in chronic migraine: a systematic review integrating randomized and real-world evidence.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. The use of pharmacologic prophylaxis for migraine in pediatric and adolescent age: a crucial concern.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Raeburn B ForbesSouthern Health and Social Care Trust, Craigavon Area Hospital, Portadown, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1444-7909
Mark McCarronWestern Health and Social Care Trust, Altnagelvin Area Hospital, Londonderry, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2387-2816
Chris R CardwellCentre for Public Health, RVH, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2689-4335
Craigavon Area Hospital · GBQueen's University Belfast · GBUniversity of Ulster · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCGRP Antibodies are high-cost newly licensed migraine preventatives.

objectiveTo calculate the overall reduction in monthly migraine days and the proportion contextual effect (PCE) using meta-analysis. The PCE is the ratio between the reduction in Monthly Migraine Days in the placebo group and the reduction in Monthly Migraine Days in the CGRP-Ab group after 3 months of treatment.

methodsMeta-analysis of randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trials of anti-CGRP antibodies in people with episodic migraine (EM) or chronic migraine (CM) in persons aged 18 or over. Non-randomized trials and trials in persons under 18 years excluded. Search of National Clinical Trials Register 2000-2019, MEDLINE to September 2019, Hand search of major headache conference abstract books 2012-2019. Two investigators used standard proforma to reach consensus. Trial quality assessed using Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool. PRISMA guidelines followed.

results21 completed trials with 13367 participants (8075 EM, 5292 CM). Compared to placebo, pooled reduction in MMD was 1.50 days in 15 EM trials (95%CI 1.16, 1.84; I

conclusionsCGRPAbs are effective but sixty-six percent of the benefit is from contextual effects, including placebo effect. Contextual effects merit further scrutiny as a means of improving migraine headache.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CarePlacebo EffectAntibodies, MonoclonalCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideCalcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor AntagonistsHumansImmunologic FactorsMigraine DisordersAntibodies, MonoclonalCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideCalcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor AntagonistsImmunologic Factors

Identifiers

PMID32668023
OpenAlexW3043583022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.