Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32668008›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2021

How common is substandard obstetric care in adverse events of birth asphyxia, shoulder dystocia and postpartum hemorrhage? Findings from an external inspection of Norwegian maternity units.

Lars T Johansen, Geir Sverre Braut, Ganesh Acharya, Jan Fredrik Andresen, Pål Øian

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Causes for Medical Errors in Obstetrics and Gynaecology.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lars T JohansenDepartment for Specialized Health Services, Norwegian Board of Health Supervision, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-1524-0640
Geir Sverre BrautDepartment for Specialized Health Services, Norwegian Board of Health Supervision, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-3337-4792
Ganesh AcharyaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-1997-3107
Jan Fredrik AndresenDepartment for Specialized Health Services, Norwegian Board of Health Supervision, Oslo, Norway.
Pål ØianDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-7391-5311

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Norwegian Board of Health Supervision inspects healthcare institutions to ensure safety and quality of health and welfare services. A planned inspection of 12 maternity units aimed to investigate the practice of obstetric care in the case of birth asphyxia, shoulder dystocia and severe postpartum hemorrhage. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe inspection was carried out at two large, four medium and six small maternity units in Norway in 2016 to investigate adverse events that occurred between 1 January and 31 December 2014. Six of them were selected as control units. The Norwegian Board of Health Supervision searched the Medical Birth Registry of Norway to identify adverse events in each of the categories and then requested access to the medical records for all patients identified. Information about guidelines, formal teaching and simulation training at each unit was obtained by sending a questionnaire to the obstetrician in charge of each maternity unit.

resultsThe obstetric units inspected had 553 serious adverse events of birth asphyxia, shoulder dystocia or severe postpartum hemorrhage among 17 323 deliveries. Twenty-nine events were excluded from further analysis due to erroneous coding or missing data in the patients' medical records. We included 524 cases (3.0% of all deliveries) of adverse events in the final analysis. Medical errors caused by substandard care were present in 295 (56.2%) cases. There was no difference in the prevalence of substandard care among the maternity units according to their size. Surprisingly, we found significantly fewer cases with substandard care in the units which the supervisory authorities considered particularly risky before the inspection, compared with the control units. Seven of the 12 units had regular formal teaching and training arrangements for obstetric healthcare personnel as outlined in the national guidelines.

conclusionsPrevalence of adverse events was 3% and similar in all maternity units irrespective of their size. A breach in the standard of care was observed in 56.2% of cases and almost half of the maternity units did not follow national recommendations regarding teaching and practical training of obstetric personnel, suggesting that they should focus on implementing guidelines and training their staff.

Indexed as

AdultAsphyxia NeonatorumFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMedical ErrorsNorwayObstetrics and Gynecology Department, HospitalPostpartum HemorrhagePregnancyRegistriesShoulder Dystociaadverse eventsasphyxiafailure of treatmentmaternity unitspostpartum hemorrhageshoulder dystociasupervision

Identifiers

PMID32668008
PMCPMC7754562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.