Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32667925›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2020

iDrug: Integration of drug repositioning and drug-target prediction via cross-network embedding.

Huiyuan Chen, Feixiong Cheng, Jing Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Subgraph Neural Networks Enhanced by Global Similarity for Drug Repositioning.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. [Drug repositioning prediction based on dynamic feature learning on heterogeneous graphs].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. AΙ-Driven Drug Repurposing: Applications and Challenges.Medicines (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Huiyuan ChenDepartment of Computer and Data Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6360-558X
Feixiong ChengGenomic Medicine Institute, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1736-2847
Jing LiDepartment of Computer and Data Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1160-6959
Case Western Reserve University · USCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine · USUniversity School · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational drug repositioning and drug-target prediction have become essential tasks in the early stage of drug discovery. In previous studies, these two tasks have often been considered separately. However, the entities studied in these two tasks (i.e., drugs, targets, and diseases) are inherently related. On one hand, drugs interact with targets in cells to modulate target activities, which in turn alter biological pathways to promote healthy functions and to treat diseases. On the other hand, both drug repositioning and drug-target prediction involve the same drug feature space, which naturally connects these two problems and the two domains (diseases and targets). By using the wisdom of the crowds, it is possible to transfer knowledge from one of the domains to the other. The existence of relationships among drug-target-disease motivates us to jointly consider drug repositioning and drug-target prediction in drug discovery. In this paper, we present a novel approach called iDrug, which seamlessly integrates drug repositioning and drug-target prediction into one coherent model via cross-network embedding. In particular, we provide a principled way to transfer knowledge from these two domains and to enhance prediction performance for both tasks. Using real-world datasets, we demonstrate that iDrug achieves superior performance on both learning tasks compared to several state-of-the-art approaches. Our code and datasets are available at: https://github.com/Case-esaC/iDrug.

Indexed as

Drug DevelopmentDrug DiscoveryAlgorithmsArea Under CurveComputational BiologyComputer SimulationDatabases, FactualDatabases, ProteinDrug RepositioningHumansMicroRNAsModels, StatisticalProtein DomainsROC CurveSoftwareMicroRNAs

Identifiers

PMID32667925
PMCPMC7384678
OpenAlexW3042289107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.