ArticlePLoS genetics2020
Unified inference of missense variant effects and gene constraints in the human genome.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- In vivo dissection of human NRXN1 isoforms reveals gain-of-function pathogenicity of schizophrenia-associated 3' deletions.Human molecular genetics · 2026Article
- Assessing variant effect predictors and disease mechanisms in intrinsically disordered proteins.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Article
- A series of reviews in familial cancer: genetic cancer risk in context variants of uncertain significance in MMR genes: which procedures should be followed?Familial cancer · 2025Review
- Variant effect predictor correlation with functional assays is reflective of clinical classification performance.Genome biology · 2025Article
- Guidelines for releasing a variant effect predictor.Genome biology · 2025Article
- A graph neural network approach for accurate prediction of pathogenicity in multi-type variants.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Considerations for reporting variants in novel candidate genes identified during clinical genomic testing.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2024Article
- Bayesian estimation of gene constraint from an evolutionary model with gene features.Nature genetics · 2024Article
- Considerations for reporting variants in novel candidate genes identified during clinical genomic testing.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Bayesian estimation of gene constraint from an evolutionary model with gene features.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Review
- An unsupervised deep learning framework for predicting human essential genes from population and functional genomic data.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Bayesian estimation of gene constraint from an evolutionary model with gene features.Research square · 2023Article
- Mapping the Constrained Coding Regions in the Human Genome to Their Corresponding Proteins.Journal of molecular biology · 2023Article
- Assessment of burden and segregation profiles of CNVs in patients with epilepsy.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2022Article
- Analysis of missense variants in the human genome reveals widespread gene-specific clustering and improves prediction of pathogenicity.American journal of human genetics · 2022Article
- Dissecting Genomic Determinants of Positive Selection with an Evolution-Guided Regression Model.Molecular biology and evolution · 2022Article
- LYRUS: a machine learning model for predicting the pathogenicity of missense variants.Bioinformatics advances · 2022Article
- Knowledge structure and emerging trends in the application of deep learning in genetics research: A bibliometric analysis [2000-2021].Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A challenge in medical genomics is to identify variants and genes associated with severe genetic disorders. Based on the premise that severe, early-onset disorders often result in a reduction of evolutionary fitness, several statistical methods have been developed to predict pathogenic variants or constrained genes based on the signatures of negative selection in human populations. However, we currently lack a statistical framework to jointly predict deleterious variants and constrained genes from both variant-level features and gene-level selective constraints. Here we present such a unified approach, UNEECON, based on deep learning and population genetics. UNEECON treats the contributions of variant-level features and gene-level constraints as a variant-level fixed effect and a gene-level random effect, respectively. The sum of the fixed and random effects is then combined with an evolutionary model to infer the strength of negative selection at both variant and gene levels. Compared with previously published methods, UNEECON shows improved performance in predicting missense variants and protein-coding genes associated with autosomal dominant disorders, and feature importance analysis suggests that both gene-level selective constraints and variant-level predictors are important for accurate variant prioritization. Furthermore, based on UNEECON, we observe a low correlation between gene-level intolerance to missense mutations and that to loss-of-function mutations, which can be partially explained by the prevalence of disordered protein regions that are highly tolerant to missense mutations. Finally, we show that genes intolerant to both missense and loss-of-function mutations play key roles in the central nervous system and the autism spectrum disorders. Overall, UNEECON is a promising framework for both variant and gene prioritization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.