Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32667901›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2020

Improving Understanding of Participation and Attrition Phenomena in European Cohort Studies: Protocol for a Multi-Situated Qualitative Study.

Sandra C S Marques, Julia Doetsch, Anne Brødsgaard, Marina Cuttini, Elizabeth S Draper, Eero Kajantie, Jo Lebeer, Sylvia van der Pal, Pernille Pedersen, RECAP - WP6 QS Work Group and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Uncovering the Role of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Cognitive Impairment Progression.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 8 countries.

Sandra C S MarquesEPIUnit, Instituto de Saúde Pública da Universidade do Porto, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4169-2624
Julia DoetschEPIUnit, Instituto de Saúde Pública da Universidade do Porto, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1388-9542
Anne BrødsgaardDepartment of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5029-9480
Marina CuttiniResearch Unit of Perinatal Epidemiology, Clinical Care and Management Innovation Research Area, Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù Institute for Research Hospitalization and Health Care, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3284-6874
Elizabeth S DraperDepartment of Health Sciences, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9340-8176
Eero KajantiePublic Health Promotion Unit, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7081-8391
Jo LebeerDepartment ELIZA Primary & Interdisciplinary Care, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5929-7783
Sylvia van der PalTNO Child Health, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9706-9298
Pernille PedersenDepartment of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0854-1018
RECAP - WP6 QS Work Group *see Acknowledgments, .
Henrique BarrosEPIUnit, Instituto de Saúde Pública da Universidade do Porto, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4699-6571
Universidade do Porto · PTAmager Hospital · DKBambino Gesù Children's Hospital · ITNorwegian University of Science and Technology · NOUniversity of Antwerp · BEUniversity of Leicester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCohort studies represent a strong methodology for increasing one's understanding of human life-course development and etiological mechanisms. Retention of participants, especially during long follow-up periods, is, however, a major challenge. A better understanding of the motives for participation and attrition in cohort studies in diverse sociogeographic and cultural settings is needed, as this information is most useful in developing effective retention strategies.

objectiveThis study aims to improve our understanding of participation and attrition phenomena in a European cohort study of very preterm/very-low-birth-weight (VPT/VLBW) infants from various sociogeographic and cultural settings to better understand variability and ultimately contribute to developing novel and more "in-context" strategies to improve retention.

methodsThis study uses a triangulation of multisituated methods to collect data on various cohorts in the Research on European Children and Adults Born Preterm (RECAP) network, which include focus group discussions, individual semidriven interviews, and a collaborative, reflexive visual methodology (participant-generated VideoStories) with relevant key actors involved with these cohort studies such as adult participants, parents (caregivers), cohort staff, health care professionals, and academic researchers. The methodological strategy aims to provide a shared flexible framework of various qualitatively driven methods to collect data on VPT/VLBW adult and child cohorts, from which research partners may choose and combine those most pertinent to apply in their own specific contexts. Data from all sources and sites will be submitted to a triangulation of phenomenological thematic analysis with discourse analysis.

resultsAs of January 2020, in this study, we enrolled 92 participants variously involved with child and adult RECAP partnering cohorts from six countries. Multisite enrollment and data collection are expected to be completed in all seven study settings by June 2020. Findings will be reported in future publications.

conclusionsQualitative research methods are a useful complement for enriching and illuminating quantitative results. We expect that opting for a multisituated study approach addressing the interplay of the lived experience of individuals in both researcher and researched stances of particular cohort study settings will contribute to filling some gaps in the understanding of participation variability and effectiveness of different implemented strategies in context. Moreover, health research subjects have traditionally been positioned as passive objects of study rather than active participants, even though they have the greatest stake in improving health care policies and practices. Including collaborative methods allows us to counteract the "top-down" model by handing over some research control to the very people who are providing the data on which research findings will be based while also acknowledging the value of their involvement. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/14997.

Indexed as

attritioncollaborative visual methodsEuropean cohortsmulti-situated qualitative studyparticipationpretermtriangulationVLBWVPT

Identifiers

PMID32667901
PMCPMC7391162
OpenAlexW3013318898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.