Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32667744›Full record

ArticleCytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry2021

A multicenter study evaluation of the ClearLLab 10C panels.

Benjamin D Hedley, Guoyan Cheng, Michael Keeney, Wolfgang Kern, Adrian Padurean, Joanne Luider, Ian Chin-Yee, Lori E Lowes, Justin Rohrbach, Robert Ortega and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A multicenter study evaluation of the ClearLLab 10C panels.Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Benjamin D HedleyDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, London Health Sciences Center, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3751-0851
Guoyan ChengDepartment of Clinical Research, Beckman Coulter, Inc., Miami, Florida, USA.
Michael KeeneyDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, London Health Sciences Center, London, Ontario, Canada.
Wolfgang KernMLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory, Department of Immunophenotyping, Munich, Germany.
Adrian PadureanNeogenomics Laboratory, Inc., Department of Flow Cytometry, Fort Myers, Florida, USA.
Joanne LuiderCalgary Laboratory Services, Flow Cytometry Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Ian Chin-YeeDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, London Health Sciences Center, London, Ontario, Canada.
Lori E LowesDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, London Health Sciences Center, London, Ontario, Canada.
Justin RohrbachDepartment of Clinical Research, Beckman Coulter, Inc., Miami, Florida, USA.
Robert OrtegaDepartment of Clinical Research, Beckman Coulter, Inc., Miami, Florida, USA.
Astrid SmitDepartment of Clinical Research, Beckman Coulter, Inc., Miami, Florida, USA.
Ka-Wai LoDepartment of Clinical Research, Beckman Coulter, Inc., Miami, Florida, USA.
Robert MagariDepartment of Clinical Research, Beckman Coulter, Inc., Miami, Florida, USA.
Liliana TejidorDepartment of Clinical Research, Beckman Coulter, Inc., Miami, Florida, USA.
Beckman Coulter Foundation · USLondon Health Sciences Centre · CACalgary Laboratory Services · CAFlometrics (United States) · USMunich Leukemia Laboratory (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiparameter flow cytometry plays an important role in the diagnosis, staging, and monitoring of patients with a suspected hematological malignancy. The ClearLLab 10C Panels consist of four reagent panels (B-Lineage Tube, T-Lineage Tube, and 2 Myeloid Lineage Tubes), each consisting of 10 color/10 antibody conjugates utilizing Beckman Coulters proprietary dry format optimized for investigating patients with suspected leukemia or lymphoma. A multicenter study was conducted to evaluate the performance of the ClearLLab 10C Panels for qualitative assessment of normal versus abnormal phenotype in peripheral blood, bone marrow, and lymph node samples with suspected hematological malignancies. ClearLLab 10C was compared to laboratory developed tests (LDTs) and final clinical diagnosis. Four clinical sites were used to enroll patient's spent specimens (n = 453); three laboratories in North America and one in Europe. Of the 453 specimens, 198 had no malignancy and 255 contained an abnormal population. The diagnostic accuracy of the ClearLLab 10C Panels was achieved with sensitivity of 96% and specificity of 95% with respect to patient final clinical diagnosis. The agreement of phenotyping between ClearLLab10C Panels and LDTs was 98%. Any differences noted between ClearLLab 10C and LDT were due to either the presence of populations below the level of detection, the lack of clinical information provided to the evaluators, or marker(s) not present in these panels. Overall, the ClearLLab 10C demonstrated excellent agreement to LDTs and diagnosis. These four reagent panels can be adopted by individual laboratories to assess the presence or absence of malignancy.

Indexed as

Flow CytometryLaboratoriesHematologic NeoplasmsHumansQuality Controlflow cytometryimmunophenotypingleukemialymphomamultiparameter

Identifiers

PMID32667744
PMCPMC8048967
OpenAlexW3043817697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.