Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32667729›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2020

Antihypertensive medication use and blood pressure control among treated older adults.

Michael E Ernst, Enayet K Chowdhury, Mark R Nelson, Christopher M Reid, Karen L Margolis, Lawrence Beilin, Nigel P Stocks, Anne M Murray, Rory Wolfe, Jessica E Lockery and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Hypertension control applying the HEARTS in the Americas protocol in Trinidad: A cross-sectional study.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Antihypertensive medication use and blood pressure control among treated older adults.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael E ErnstDepartment of Family Medicine, Carver College of Medicine, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0267-4888
Enayet K ChowdhuryDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University VIC, Australia.
Mark R NelsonMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Christopher M ReidDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University VIC, Australia.
Karen L MargolisHealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Lawrence BeilinMedical School Royal Perth Hospital, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Nigel P StocksDiscipline of General Practice, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Anne M MurrayBerman Center for Outcomes and Clinical Research, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, and University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Rory WolfeDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University VIC, Australia.
Jessica E LockeryDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University VIC, Australia.
Suzanne G OrchardDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University VIC, Australia.
Robyn L WoodsDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University VIC, Australia.
John J McNeilDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University VIC, Australia.
ASPREE Investigator GroupASPREE Investigator Group listed at, www.ASPREE.org.
Monash University · AUCurtin University · AUHealthPartners · USThe University of Adelaide · AUThe University of Western Australia · AUUniversity of Iowa · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Tasmania · AU

Funding

ASPirin in Reducing Events in the ElderlyU01AG029824 · NIA · HENNEPIN HEALTHCARE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI MCNEIL, JOHN JAMES, MURRAY, ANNE M · 2009 to 2018
$64.6M
Main Administrative CoreU19AG062682 · NIA · HENNEPIN HEALTHCARE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI MURRAY, ANNE M · 2019 to 2023
$42.9M
Research Education CoreP30AG024824 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Neil Alexander · 2004 to 2026
$29.2M
UTMB OAIC Research Education Component (REC)P30AG024832 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI JAMES S. GOODWIN, MD, MELISSA M. MORROW · 2005 to 2026
$26.7M
NCI NIH HHSNIA NIH HHS P30 AG024824NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024832NIA NIH HHS U01 AG029824NIA NIH HHS U01AG029824NIA NIH HHS U19 AG062682
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The association of different antihypertensive regimens with blood pressure (BP) control is not well-described among community-dwelling older adults with low comorbidity. We examined antihypertensive use and BP control in 10 062 treated hypertensives from Australia and the United States (US) using baseline data from the ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) trial. Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) drugs were the most prevalently used antihypertensive in both countries (Australia: 81.7% of all regimens; US: 62.9% of all regimens; P < .001). Diuretics were the next most commonly used antihypertensive in both countries, but were more often included in regimens of US participants (48.9%, vs 33.3% of regimens in Australia; P < .001). Among all antihypertensive classes and possible combinations, monotherapy with a RAS drug was the most common regimen in both countries, but with higher prevalence in Australian than US participants (35.9% vs 20.9%; P < .001). For both monotherapy and combination users, BP control rates across age, ethnicity, and sex were consistently lower in Australian than US participants. After adjustment for age, sex, ethnicity, and BMI, significantly lower BP control rates remained in Australian compared to US participants for the most commonly used classes and regimens (RAS blocker monotherapy: BP control = 45.5% vs 54.2%; P = .002; diuretic monotherapy: BP control = 45.2% vs 64.5%; P = .001; and RAS blocker/diuretic combo: BP control = 50.2% vs 65.6%; P = .001). Our findings highlight variation in antihypertensive use in older adults treated for hypertension, with implications for BP control. Differences in BP control that were observed may be influenced, in part, by reasons other than choice of specific regimens.

Indexed as

HypertensionAgedAntihypertensive AgentsAustraliaBlood PressureDiureticsDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansMaleUnited StatesAntihypertensive AgentsDiureticsantihypertensive therapyblood pressure controlhypertension in older adults

Identifiers

PMID32667729
PMCPMC7901812
OpenAlexW3042234098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.