ArticleBiotechnology and bioengineering2020
Wide-surface pore microfiltration membrane drastically improves sieving decay in TFF-based perfusion cell culture and streamline chromatography integration for continuous bioprocessing.
Article in Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic Investigation of Impact of Antifoam and Extracellular Vesicles on Fouling of Hollow Fiber Filters in Intensified Perfusion Processes Highlights the Key Impact of Antifoam.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2025Article
- End-to-end collaboration to transform biopharmaceutical development and manufacturing.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2021Review
- A common framework for integrated and continuous biomanufacturing.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2021Review
- Wide-surface pore microfiltration membrane drastically improves sieving decay in TFF-based perfusion cell culture and streamline chromatography integration for continuous bioprocessing.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although several compelling benefits for bioprocess intensification have been reported, the need for a streamlined integration of perfusion cultures with capture chromatography still remains unmet. Here, a robust solution is established by conducting tangential flow filtration-based perfusion with a wide-surface pore microfiltration membrane. The resulting integrated continuous bioprocess demonstrated negligible retention of antibody, DNA, and host cell proteins in the bioreactor with average sieving coefficients of 98 ± 1%, 124 ± 28%, and 109 ± 27%, respectively. Further discussion regarding the potential membrane fouling mechanisms is also provided by comparing two membranes with different surface pore structures and the same hollow fiber length, total membrane area, and chemistry. A cake-growth profile is reported for the narrower surface pore, 0.65-µm nominal retention perfusion membrane with final antibody sieving coefficients ≤70%. Whereas the sieving coefficient remained ≥85% during 40 culture days for the wide-surface pore, 0.2-µm nominal retention rating membrane. The wide-surface pore structure, confirmed by scanning electron microscopy imaging, minimizes the formation of biomass deposits on the membrane surface and drastically improves product sieving. This study not only offers a robust alternative for integrated continuous bioprocess by eliminating additional filtration steps while overcoming sieving decay, but also provides insight into membranes' fouling mechanism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.