Trial reportJAMA surgery2020
Nasogastric Decompression vs No Decompression After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: The Randomized Clinical IPOD Trial.
Trial report in JAMA surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Impact of the Absence of Nasogastric Decompression After Pancreaticoduodenectomy : A Prospective and Randomized Study
A Single Center Prospective Randomized Trial of Complete vs. Postoperative Nasogastric Tube Omission in Pancreaticoduodenectomied Patients
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Non-drug perioperative interventions to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications after abdominal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2026Pooled it
- Clinical Practice Guideline: Recommendations for the Perioperative Management of Pancreatic and Colorectal Cancer Patients.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2024Guideline
- Pooled it
- Outcomes of avoidance of routine nasogastric decompression following elective major gastrointestinal and hepatopancreatobiliary surgery: a single-center prospective observational cohort study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- A systematic review of methodology in nutritional trials in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2026Review
- Reporting Standards and Quality Assurance Methods for Pancreatoduodenectomy in Randomised Controlled Trials: A Structured Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Is nasogastric intubation still necessary after pancreaticoduodenectomy? A case-control cohort study.Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2026Article
- Enhanced preoperative prediction of pancreatic fistula using radiomics and clinical features with SHAP visualization.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in Pancreatic Surgery: The Surgeon's Point of View.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Associations Between Patient Characteristics and Whipple Procedure Outcomes Before and After Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023Article
- Impact of perioperative blood transfusion on oncological outcomes in ampullary carcinoma patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2023Article
- Iterative Changes in Risk-Stratified Pancreatectomy Clinical Pathways and Accelerated Discharge After Pancreaticoduodenectomy.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2022Article
- The CONSORT Framework.JAMA surgery · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Although standardization of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) has improved postoperative outcomes, morbidity remains high. Fast-track surgery programs appear to improve morbidity, and avoiding nasogastric tube decompression (NGTD), already outdated in most major abdominal surgery, is strongly suggested after PD by fast-track surgery programs but lacks high-level evidence, especially regarding safety. Objective: To assess in a randomized clinical trial whether the absence of systematic NGTD after PD reduces postoperative complications. Design, Setting, and Participants: The IPOD study (Impact of the Absence of Nasogastric Decompression After Pancreaticoduodenectomy) was an open-label, prospective, single-center, randomized clinical trial conducted at a high-volume pancreatic surgery university hospital in France. In total, 155 patients who were 18 to 75 years of age and required PD for benign or malignant disease were screened for study eligibility. Key exclusion criteria were previous gastric or esophageal surgery and severe comorbidities. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to systematic NGTD or to no nasogastric decompression and were followed up until 90 days after surgery. Interventions: For patients without NGTD, the NGT was removed immediately after surgery, whereas for patients with NGTD, the NGT was removed 3 to 5 days after surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the occurrence of postoperative complications grade II or higher using the Clavien-Dindo classification. The primary end point and safety were evaluated in the intent-to-treat population. Results: From January 2016 to August 2018, 125 screened patients were considered eligible for the study, and 111 were randomized to no NGTD (n = 52) or to NGTD (n = 59). No patient was lost to follow-up. The 2 groups had similar patient demographic and clinical characteristics at baseline. The median (interquartile range) age was 63.0 (57.0-66.5) years in the group with NGTD (38 [64.4%] were males) and 64.0 (58.0-68.0) years in the group without NGTD (31 [59.6%] were males). The postoperative complication rates grade II or higher were similar between the 2 groups (risk ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.66-1.47; P > .99). Pulmonary complication rates (risk ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.18-1.95; P = .44) and delayed gastric emptying rates (risk ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.52-2.21; P > .99) were not significantly different between the groups. Median (interquartile) length of hospital stay for patients without NGTD was not significantly different compared with those with NGTD (10.0 [9.0-16.3] vs 12.0 [10.0-16.0] days; P = .14). Conclusions and Relevance: The present study found no significant difference in postoperative complication occurrence of Clavien-Dindo classification grade II or higher between systematic NGTD and no NGTD after PD, suggesting that avoiding systematic nasogastric decompression is safe for this indication. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02594956.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.