Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32667458›Full record

ArticleMemorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz2020

Evaluation of different total Leishmania amazonensis antigens for the development of a first-generation vaccine formulated with a Toll-like receptor-3 agonist to prevent cutaneous leishmaniasis.

María José Germanó, Esteban Sebastián Lozano, María Victoria Sanchez, Flavia Alejandra Bruna, María Fernanda García-Bustos, Arianna Lourdes Sosa Lochedino, María Cristina Salomón, Ana Paula Fernandes, Juan Pablo Mackern-Oberti, Diego Esteban Cargnelutti

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Therapeutic effect ofJournal of traditional and complementary medicine · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. MPLA and AddaVaxMicroorganisms · 2021
    Article
  5. Long-TermJournal of immunology research · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

María José GermanóInstituto de Medicina y Biología Experimental de Cuyo, Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas, Mendoza, Argentina.
Esteban Sebastián LozanoInstituto de Medicina y Biología Experimental de Cuyo, Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas, Mendoza, Argentina.
María Victoria SanchezInstituto de Medicina y Biología Experimental de Cuyo, Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas, Mendoza, Argentina.
Flavia Alejandra BrunaInstituto de Medicina y Biología Experimental de Cuyo, Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas, Mendoza, Argentina.
María Fernanda García-BustosInstituto de Patología Experimental, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas, Salta, Argentina.
Arianna Lourdes Sosa LochedinoInstituto de Medicina y Biología Experimental de Cuyo, Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas, Mendoza, Argentina.
María Cristina SalomónFacultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, Mendoza, Argentina.
Ana Paula FernandesFaculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Juan Pablo Mackern-ObertiInstituto de Medicina y Biología Experimental de Cuyo, Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas, Mendoza, Argentina.
Diego Esteban CargneluttiInstituto de Medicina y Biología Experimental de Cuyo, Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas, Mendoza, Argentina.
Universidad Nacional de Cuyo · ARCentro Científico Tecnológico - San Juan · ARUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Unfortunately, no any vaccine against leishmaniasis has been developed for human use. Therefore, a vaccine based on total Leishmania antigens could be a good and economic approach; and there are different methodologies to obtain these antigens. However, it is unknown whether the method to obtain the antigens affects the integrity and immune response caused by them. OBJECTIVES to compare the protein profile and immune response generated by total L. amazonensis antigens (TLA) produced by different methods, as well as to analyse the immune response and protection by a first-generation vaccine formulated with sonicated TLA (sTLA) and polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid [Poly (I:C)]. METHODS TLA were obtained by four different methodologies and their integrity and immune response were evaluated. Finally, sTLA was formulated with Poly (I:C) and their protective immune response was measured. FINDINGS sTLA presented a conserved protein profile and induced a strong immune response. In addition, Poly (I:C) improved the immune response generated by sTLA. Finally, sTLA + Poly (I:C) formulation provided partial protection against L. amazonensis infection. MAIN CONCLUSIONS The protein profile and immune response depend on the methodology used to obtain the antigens. Also, the formulation sTLA + Poly (I:C) provides partial protection against cutaneous leishmaniasis in mice.

Indexed as

LeishmaniaLeishmaniasis VaccinesAnimalsAntigens, ProtozoanHumansLeishmaniasis, CutaneousMiceMice, Inbred BALB CProtozoan VaccinesToll-Like Receptor 3Antigens, ProtozoanLeishmaniasis VaccinesProtozoan VaccinesTLR3 protein, mouseToll-Like Receptor 3

Identifiers

PMID32667458
PMCPMC7357544
OpenAlexW3042473936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.